Aubry M C, Aubry J P, Dommergues M
Maternité, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, AP-HP, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75743 Paris Cedex 15, France.
Childs Nerv Syst. 2003 Aug;19(7-8):391-402. doi: 10.1007/s00381-003-0768-3. Epub 2003 Aug 6.
Over the past 20 years, the spectrum of neonatal neurological malformations has changed due to the diffusion of ultrasound, performed either routinely or as required by maternal alpha-fetoprotein screening or history.
We review and illustrate the potential of ultrasound for the prenatal diagnosis of abnormalities in size or shape of the skull (macrocephaly, microcephaly, craniostenosis), neural tube defects, ventriculomegaly, hydrocephalus, posterior fossa defects (abnormalities in the size of the cisterna magna, cerebellar abnormalities), midline abnormalities (holoprosencephaly, abnormalities of the corpus callosum), ischemic lesions and hemorrhage, tumours, and focalized hyperechogenic images. The limits of fetal ultrasound screening and of the various diagnostic strategies implemented when a fetal brain abnormality is suspected are discussed. Overall, gross lethal abnormalities such as anencephaly or major hydrocephaly are accessible to prenatal sonographic screening, and nearly always result in termination of the pregnancy. However, hydrocephaly may progress late in gestation and remain undiscovered unless a third trimester ultrasound is performed. A majority of cases with myelomeningocele are diagnosed prenatally, resulting either in termination of the pregnancy or in neonatal management. A growing number of more subtle abnormalities, including midline or posterior fossa abnormalities can be spotted by fetal ultrasound, but their postnatal outcome cannot always be predicted accurately, despite the use of fetal magnetic resonance imaging. In such cases, a trans-disciplinary approach involving perinatologists, pediatric radiologists, neuropathologists, neurosurgeons or neurologists familiar with neonates is crucial to counseling the parents. Some brain abnormalities are still extremely difficult or even impossible to diagnose in utero despite advances in sonographic imaging. This is due to the fact that severe neurological impairment may result from conditions that do not affect substantially affect the morphology of the brain, and that major structural abnormalities may develop late in gestation, and thus remain undetected at second trimester ultrasound.
Ultrasound screening identifies a growing number of central nervous system abnormalities, resulting in substantial changes in the neonatal presentation of neurological congenital abnormalities.
在过去20年中,由于超声检查的普及,新生儿神经畸形的范围发生了变化,超声检查可常规进行,也可根据母体甲胎蛋白筛查或病史按需进行。
我们回顾并阐述了超声在产前诊断颅骨大小或形状异常(巨头畸形、小头畸形、颅缝早闭)、神经管缺陷、脑室扩大、脑积水、后颅窝缺陷(枕大池大小异常、小脑异常)、中线异常(前脑无裂畸形、胼胝体异常)、缺血性病变和出血、肿瘤以及局灶性高回声图像方面的潜力。讨论了胎儿超声筛查的局限性以及在怀疑胎儿脑部异常时实施的各种诊断策略。总体而言,诸如无脑儿或严重脑积水等严重致死性异常可通过产前超声筛查发现,并且几乎总会导致终止妊娠。然而,脑积水可能在妊娠后期进展,除非进行孕晚期超声检查,否则仍可能未被发现。大多数脊髓脊膜膨出病例在产前被诊断出来,要么导致终止妊娠,要么进行新生儿管理。越来越多更细微的异常,包括中线或后颅窝异常,可通过胎儿超声发现,但尽管使用了胎儿磁共振成像,其产后结局并不总能准确预测。在这种情况下,采用跨学科方法,包括围产医学专家、儿科放射科医生、神经病理学家、熟悉新生儿的神经外科医生或神经科医生,对于为父母提供咨询至关重要。尽管超声成像技术有所进步,但某些脑部异常在子宫内仍极难甚至无法诊断。这是因为严重的神经损伤可能由对大脑形态没有实质性影响的情况导致,而且主要结构异常可能在妊娠后期才出现,因此在孕中期超声检查时仍未被发现。
超声筛查发现的中枢神经系统异常越来越多,导致神经先天性异常的新生儿表现发生了重大变化。