Ellis Edward, Muniz Oscar, Anand Kapil
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9109, USA.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Aug;61(8):861-70. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00249-0.
We sought to assess the methods of treatment used and outcomes for a large sample of patients with comminuted fractures of the mandible.
The records of all patients who were identified as having comminuted fractures of the mandible over a 10-year period with sufficient follow-up were collected and analyzed for demographic information, treatment rendered, and outcomes. Standard descriptive statistics and nonparametric statistics were used to analyze the data.
A total of 196 patients (167 males and 29 females) with 198 comminuted fractures met the inclusion criteria. The mandibular body was the most commonly affected region. Approximately half were sustained in altercations. Gunshot wounds created fractures that were more comminuted than other causes. The comminuted regions were treated by closed reduction and maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) in 35 fractures, open reduction with stable internal fixation in 146 fractures, and 17 were treated with external pin fixation. For those patients treated with open reduction, a single reconstruction bone plate was used in the majority of cases (114). For those patients treated open, 98 were treated using an intraoral approach and 52 were treated using an extraoral approach. The mean follow-up was 140.6 days. Complications occurred in 26 fractures (13%). The complications were malocclusion in 8 fractures and nonocclusal (ie, infection, nonunion, etc) in 18 fractures. There was a statistically significant relationship between the development of complications and the degree of fragmentation (P <.05). There was also a significant relationship between treatment and the development of complications (P <.05). Patients treated with external pin fixation had a 35.2% complication rate compared with a 17.1% complication rate for patients undergoing closed treatment with MMF, or patients treated with open reduction and stable internal fixation (10.3%). However, patients treated with external pin fixation had more severe injuries.
The results of this study show that, when possible, the use of open reduction and stable internal fixation is associated with a low complication rate. However, not all comminuted fractures are amenable to this treatment, and in those, alternatives such as closed reduction with MMF or the application of external pin fixation may be necessary.
我们试图评估大量下颌骨粉碎性骨折患者的治疗方法及治疗结果。
收集并分析10年间所有确诊为下颌骨粉碎性骨折且有足够随访资料的患者记录,内容包括人口统计学信息、所接受的治疗及治疗结果。采用标准描述性统计和非参数统计方法分析数据。
共有196例患者(167例男性,29例女性)发生198处粉碎性骨折,符合纳入标准。下颌体是最常受累区域。约半数骨折是在争吵中发生的。枪伤造成的骨折比其他原因造成的骨折粉碎程度更高。35处粉碎性骨折采用闭合复位及颌间固定(MMF)治疗,146处采用切开复位加坚固内固定治疗,17处采用外固定针治疗。对于接受切开复位治疗的患者,大多数病例(114例)使用单一重建接骨板。对于接受切开治疗的患者,98例采用口内入路,52例采用口外入路。平均随访时间为140.6天。26处骨折(13%)出现并发症。8处骨折出现咬合不正并发症,18处骨折出现非咬合性并发症(如感染、骨不连等)。并发症的发生与骨折碎片程度之间存在统计学显著关系(P<.05)。治疗与并发症的发生之间也存在显著关系(P<.05)。接受外固定针治疗的患者并发症发生率为35.2%,而接受MMF闭合治疗或切开复位加坚固内固定治疗的患者并发症发生率为17.1%(10.3%)。然而,接受外固定针治疗的患者损伤更严重。
本研究结果表明,在可能的情况下,采用切开复位加坚固内固定治疗并发症发生率较低。然而,并非所有粉碎性骨折都适合这种治疗方法,对于这些患者,可能需要采用如MMF闭合复位或应用外固定针等替代方法。