Stiffler Kevin S, McCrackin Stevenson M A, Cornell Karen K, Glerum Leigh E, Smith Julie D, Miller Nathan A, Rawlings Clarence A
Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7390, USA.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003 Aug 1;223(3):325-9, 309-10. doi: 10.2460/javma.2003.223.325.
Traditional cystostomy tubes (used for temporary or permanent diversion of urine in dogs and cats) are long (> or = 22 cm) and cumbersome to stabilize, requiring sutures or bandages to hold the tube against the body. Use of a low-profile gastrostomy port system as a low-profile cystostomy tube (LPCT) in 4 dogs and a cat was investigated; owner satisfaction with the device was assessed. Technical difficulty associated with placement and management of LPCTs was similar to that for traditional cystostomy tubes; with LPCTs, activity and mobility of pets was not compromised, and bandaging was not required. Complications included lower urinary tract infection, mild peristomal leakage of urine and leakage from components of the system, and subcutaneous peristomal infection. Four of 5 owners considered the tube to be easy to use; all owners said they would be comfortable repeating their decision to use the LPCT in their pet.
传统的膀胱造瘘管(用于犬猫尿液的临时或永久性引流)较长(≥22厘米),固定起来很麻烦,需要缝线或绷带将管子固定在身体上。研究了在4只犬和1只猫中使用一种低轮廓胃造口端口系统作为低轮廓膀胱造瘘管(LPCT)的情况;评估了主人对该装置的满意度。LPCT放置和管理相关的技术难度与传统膀胱造瘘管相似;使用LPCT时,宠物的活动和行动能力不受影响,也不需要包扎。并发症包括下尿路感染、造口周围轻度尿液渗漏和系统部件渗漏,以及造口周围皮下感染。5位主人中有4位认为该管子易于使用;所有主人都表示,如果再次为宠物选择使用LPCT,他们会感到安心。