• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无论在俯卧位还是侧卧位进行超声成像,腰椎多裂肌的大小并无差异。

Lumbar multifidus muscle size does not differ whether ultrasound imaging is performed in prone or side lying.

作者信息

Coldron Y, Stokes M, Cook K

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, St George's Hospital Medical School, University of London, UK.

出版信息

Man Ther. 2003 Aug;8(3):161-5. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00011-0.

DOI:10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00011-0
PMID:12909436
Abstract

This methodological study examined the influence of body position when measuring multifidus muscle size using real-time ultrasound imaging. Previous studies examined multifidus with the subject prone but people with certain conditions cannot be studied in this position, so side lying was investigated as an alternative posture. In 20 normal females (aged 19-45 years), the cross-sectional area (CSA) of lumbar multifidus was measured at the level of the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) on both the right and left sides, with the subject in prone and in side lying. Multifidus CSA was highly correlated between the two positions on both the right (r=0.90) and left (r=0.91) sides. Paired t-tests found no significant differences between the measurements made in the two scanning postures (right P=0.77; left P=0.16). Bland and Altman plots showed good agreement between the two positions, with no systematic difference. These findings demonstrate that measurements of lumbar multifidus at L5 can be made in either prone or side lying and a valid comparison of the results obtained in both positions can be made.

摘要

这项方法学研究探讨了使用实时超声成像测量多裂肌大小时身体位置的影响。以往的研究在受试者俯卧位时对多裂肌进行检查,但某些情况下的患者无法在此体位进行研究,因此研究了侧卧位作为替代姿势。在20名正常女性(年龄19 - 45岁)中,让受试者分别处于俯卧位和侧卧位,在第五腰椎(L5)水平测量左右两侧腰多裂肌的横截面积(CSA)。右侧和左侧两个体位的多裂肌CSA高度相关(右侧r = 0.90;左侧r = 0.91)。配对t检验发现两种扫描姿势下的测量结果无显著差异(右侧P = 0.77;左侧P = 0.16)。Bland和Altman图显示两个体位之间一致性良好,无系统差异。这些结果表明,L5水平的腰多裂肌测量可以在俯卧位或侧卧位进行,并且可以对两个体位获得的结果进行有效比较。

相似文献

1
Lumbar multifidus muscle size does not differ whether ultrasound imaging is performed in prone or side lying.无论在俯卧位还是侧卧位进行超声成像,腰椎多裂肌的大小并无差异。
Man Ther. 2003 Aug;8(3):161-5. doi: 10.1016/s1356-689x(03)00011-0.
2
Ultrasound imaging of lumbar multifidus muscle: normal reference ranges for measurements and practical guidance on the technique.腰椎多裂肌的超声成像:测量的正常参考范围及该技术的实用指南。
Man Ther. 2005 May;10(2):116-26. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2004.08.013. Epub 2004 Nov 18.
3
Relationship between low back pain and lumbar multifidus size at different postures.不同姿势下腰痛与腰多裂肌大小的关系。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 1;31(19):2258-62. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000232807.76033.33.
4
Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography of the lumbar multifidus muscle. Comparison of two different modalities.腰椎多裂肌的磁共振成像与超声检查:两种不同检查方式的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jan 1;20(1):54-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199501000-00010.
5
Dynamic changes of elasticity, cross-sectional area, and fat infiltration of multifidus at different postures in men with chronic low back pain.慢性腰痛男性在不同姿势下多裂肌的弹性、横截面积和脂肪浸润的动态变化。
Spine J. 2012 May;12(5):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.004. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
6
Lumbar multifidus layers stiffness at L5-S1 level in prone and sitting posture measured by shear wave elastography.采用剪切波弹性成像技术测量的俯卧位和坐位时 L5-S1 水平多裂肌各层刚度。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2024;37(5):1241-1248. doi: 10.3233/BMR-230333.
7
Ultrasound transducer shape has no effect on measurements of lumbar multifidus muscle size.超声换能器形状对腰多裂肌大小的测量没有影响。
Man Ther. 2012 Apr;17(2):187-91. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
8
Multifidus muscle size and percentage thickness changes among patients with unilateral chronic low back pain (CLBP) and healthy controls in prone and standing.单侧慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者与健康对照者在俯卧位和站立位时多裂肌大小及厚度百分比的变化。
Man Ther. 2014 Oct;19(5):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 9.
9
Asymmetric degeneration of paravertebral muscles in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis.退变性腰椎侧凸患者的脊柱旁肌肉不对称性退变。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jul 15;37(16):1398-406. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824c767e.
10
Real-time ultrasound measures of lumbar erector spinae and multifidus: reliability and comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.竖脊肌和多裂肌的实时超声测量:可靠性及与磁共振成像的比较
Physiol Meas. 2015 Nov;36(11):2285-99. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/36/11/2285. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Human skeletal muscle size with ultrasound imaging: a comprehensive review.超声成像评估人体骨骼肌大小:全面综述
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2022 May 1;132(5):1267-1279. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00041.2022. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
The Role of Rehabilitative Ultrasound Imaging Technique in the Lumbopelvic Region as a Diagnosis and Treatment Tool in Physiotherapy: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.康复超声成像技术在腰骨盆区域作为物理治疗中诊断和治疗工具的作用:系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 3;10(23):5699. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235699.
3
Inconsistent descriptions of lumbar multifidus morphology: A scoping review.
腰椎多裂肌形态描述不一致:范围综述。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 May 19;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03257-7.
4
THE COMPARISON OF THE LUMBAR MULTIFIDUS MUSCLES FUNCTION BETWEEN GYMNASTIC ATHLETES WITH SWAY-BACK POSTURE AND NORMAL POSTURE.脊柱前凸姿势与正常姿势的体操运动员腰椎多裂肌功能比较
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Aug;12(4):607-615.
5
The Association between Imaging Parameters of the Paraspinal Muscles, Spinal Degeneration, and Low Back Pain.椎旁肌成像参数、脊柱退变与腰痛之间的关联
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2562957. doi: 10.1155/2017/2562957. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
6
The role of ultrasound in diagnosis of the causes of low back pain: a review of the literature.超声在诊断下腰痛病因中的作用:文献综述
Asian J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;6(1):e23803. doi: 10.5812/asjsm.23803. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
7
Reliability of rehabilitative ultrasonography to measure transverse abdominis and multifidus muscle dimensions.康复超声测量腹横肌和多裂肌尺寸的可靠性
Iran J Radiol. 2014 Aug;11(3):e21008. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.21008. Epub 2014 Aug 20.