[Off-pump versus standard on-pump reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting].

BACKGROUND

Using standard on-pump procedures, repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABGs) are associated with a higher morbidity and mortality than first-time CABGs. This retrospective study assessed the clinical outcomes of off-pump re-CABG versus on-pump re-CABG.

METHODS

From 1983, 2nd CABG and 3rd CABGs were performed in 162 patients at our institute. The early and late results of 142 patients who received standard on-pump re-CABGs and 20 patients who received off-pump re-CABGs were evaluated. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, preoperative ejection fraction (EF) and number of coronary lesions. However, mean number of distal anastomoses per patient was significantly higher in on-pump (2.0 +/- 0.8) than in off-pump re-CABG (1.4 +/- 0.6) [p = 0.0009].

RESULTS

Hospital mortality tended to be higher in the on-pump group (5.6%) than in the off-pump group (0%) [p = 0.6]. Morbidity in term of total postoperative complications tended to be higher for on-pump (14.1%) than in off-pump (0%) [p = 0.14]. The 5-year survival rate tended to be higher in the off-pump group (100%) than in the on-pump group (80.8 +/- 3.5%) [p = 0.096].

CONCLUSIONS

In selected patients, off-pump re-CABG can be a reliable and safe option. The mid-term survival and event-free survival rates achievable with the off-pump option are encouraging.