Kim Kyoung Ok, Um Woo Sik, Kim Chong Sung
Division of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, #28, Yeongon-Dong, Chongro-Ku, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Anaesthesia. 2003 Sep;58(9):889-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03336.x.
The length of the trachea varies and is relatively short in children, it is therefore difficult to determine the correct depth of tracheal tube placement. In 85 children, the tube was placed using one of the following methods: (i) after deliberate endobronchial intubation, withdrawal to the carina was confirmed by auscultation, and the tube was then withdrawn a further 2 cm (auscultation group); (ii) as above, except that withdrawal to the carina was confirmed by a decrease in peak inspiratory pressure (pressure group); (iii) the tube was placed with a 3.0-cm mark at the vocal cords (mark group). The mean (SD) distance from the tip of the tube to the carina was 1.91 (0.81) cm in the auscultation group, and 1.93 (0.67) cm in the pressure group. These were not significantly different (p > 0.05) from targeted distance of 2 cm. In the mark group, the tube was located 2.30 (0.98) cm above the carina in children younger than 36 months and was further from the carina [6.16 (1.0) cm] in older children. In 20% of patients initially randomly allocated to the mark group, the mark could not be visualised. In conclusion, the methods described above effectively achieve adequate tracheal tube depth in children.
气管长度因人而异,儿童的气管相对较短,因此很难确定气管导管置入的正确深度。在85名儿童中,采用以下方法之一放置导管:(i) 故意进行支气管内插管后,通过听诊确认导管退至隆突,然后将导管再拔出2 cm(听诊组);(ii) 与上述方法相同,但通过吸气峰压下降确认导管退至隆突(压力组);(iii) 在声带处放置有3.0 cm标记的导管(标记组)。听诊组导管尖端至隆突的平均(标准差)距离为1.91(0.81)cm,压力组为1.93(0.67)cm。这些与目标距离2 cm无显著差异(p>0.05)。在标记组中,36个月以下儿童的导管位于隆突上方2.30(0.98)cm处,年龄较大儿童的导管离隆突更远[6.16(1.0)cm]。最初随机分配到标记组的患者中有20%无法看到标记。总之,上述方法可有效实现儿童气管导管的合适深度。