• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在服务于同一市场的退伍军人事务医院和私立医院中的死亡率及住院时长。

Mortality and length of stay in a veterans affairs hospital and private sector hospitals serving a common market.

作者信息

Rosenthal Gary E, Sarrazin Mary Vaughan, Harper Dwain L, Fuehrer Susan M

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):601-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.11209.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.11209.x
PMID:12911641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1494896/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare severity-adjusted in-hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) in a Veterans Administration (VA) hospital and private sector hospitals serving the same health care market.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A large VA hospital and 27 private sector hospitals in the same metropolitan area.

PATIENTS

Consecutive VA (N = 1,960) and private sector (N = 157,147) admissions in 1994 to 1995 with 9 high-volume diagnoses.

MEASUREMENTS

Severity of illness was measured using validated multivariable models that were based on data abstracted from medical records. Outcomes were adjusted for severity and compared in VA and private sector patients using multiple logistic or linear regression analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Unadjusted mortality was similar in VA and private sector patients (5.0% vs 5.6%, respectively; P =.26), although mean LOS was longer in VA patients (12.7 vs 7.0 days; P <.001). Adjusting for severity, the odds of death in VA patients was similar (odds ratio [OR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.74 to 1.54; P =.73). However, a larger proportion of deaths in VA patients occurred later during hospitalization (P <.001), and the odds of death in VA patients were actually lower (P <.05) in analyses limited to deaths during the first 7 (OR, 0.56) or 14 (OR, 0.63) days. Adjusted LOS was longer (P <.001) in VA patients for all 9 diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

If the current findings generalizable to other markets, hospital mortality, a widely used performance measure, may be similar or lower in VA and private sector hospitals serving the same markets. The longer LOS of VA patients may reflect differences in practice patterns and may be an important source of bias in comparisons of VA and private sector hospitals.

摘要

目的

比较退伍军人事务部(VA)医院与服务于同一医疗市场的私立医院中经病情严重程度调整后的住院死亡率和住院时间(LOS)。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

一家大型VA医院和同一大都市地区的27家私立医院。

患者

1994年至1995年连续收治的VA患者(N = 1960)和私立医院患者(N = 157147),诊断疾病有9种且病例数多。

测量

使用基于从病历中提取的数据经过验证的多变量模型来测量疾病严重程度。对病情严重程度进行调整后,采用多元逻辑回归或线性回归分析对VA患者和私立医院患者的结局进行比较。

主要结果

VA患者和私立医院患者未调整的死亡率相似(分别为5.0%和5.6%;P = 0.26),尽管VA患者的平均住院时间更长(12.7天对7.0天;P < 0.001)。经病情严重程度调整后,VA患者死亡的几率相似(优势比[OR]为1.07;95%置信区间[95%CI]为0.74至1.54;P = 0.73)。然而,VA患者中较大比例的死亡发生在住院后期(P < 0.001),并且在仅限于前7天(OR,0.56)或14天(OR, 0.63)内死亡的分析中,VA患者死亡的几率实际上更低(P < 0.05)。对于所有9种诊断,VA患者调整后的住院时间更长(P < 0.001)。

结论

如果当前的研究结果可推广到其他市场,那么在服务于相同市场的VA医院和私立医院中,广泛使用的绩效指标——医院死亡率可能相似或更低。VA患者较长的住院时间可能反映了医疗实践模式的差异,并且可能是VA医院与私立医院比较中偏差的一个重要来源。

相似文献

1
Mortality and length of stay in a veterans affairs hospital and private sector hospitals serving a common market.在服务于同一市场的退伍军人事务医院和私立医院中的死亡率及住院时长。
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):601-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.11209.x.
2
Length of stay as a source of bias in comparing performance in VA and private sector facilities: lessons learned from a regional evaluation of intensive care outcomes.在比较退伍军人事务部(VA)设施和私营部门设施的绩效时,住院时间作为偏差来源:从重症监护结果的区域评估中吸取的教训。
Med Care. 2001 Sep;39(9):1014-24. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200109000-00011.
3
In-hospital mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Veterans Health Administration and private sector hospitals.退伍军人健康管理局和私立医院中冠状动脉搭桥手术后的院内死亡率。
Med Care. 2003 Apr;41(4):522-35. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000053231.70549.2D.
4
Using severity-adjusted mortality to compare performance in a Veterans Affairs hospital and in private-sector hospitals.利用严重程度调整后的死亡率比较退伍军人事务医院和私立医院的绩效。
Am J Med Qual. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):207-11. doi: 10.1177/106286060001500505.
5
Interpreting risk-adjusted length of stay patterns for VA hospitals.解读退伍军人事务部医院的风险调整住院时长模式。
Med Care. 1998 Dec;36(12):1660-75. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199812000-00004.
6
Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals.在私立医院接受冠状动脉血运重建术的退伍军人事务部患者的死亡率。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1802-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00720.x.
7
Differences in length of stay in Veterans Health Administration and other United States hospitals: is the gap closing?退伍军人健康管理局与美国其他医院住院时间的差异:差距正在缩小吗?
Med Care. 2003 Aug;41(8):882-94. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200308000-00003.
8
Outcomes of Women Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery in Veterans Affairs Compared With Non-Veterans Affairs Care Settings.退伍军人事务部与非退伍军人事务部护理环境中接受非心脏手术的女性的结果比较。
JAMA Surg. 2024 May 1;159(5):501-509. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.8081.
9
Associations between reduced hospital length of stay and 30-day readmission rate and mortality: 14-year experience in 129 Veterans Affairs hospitals.住院时间缩短与 30 天再入院率和死亡率之间的关联:129 家退伍军人事务医院 14 年的经验。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Dec 18;157(12):837-45. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-12-201212180-00003.
10
Comparison of Wait Times for New Patients Between the Private Sector and United States Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.私营部门和美国退伍军人事务医疗中心新患者等待时间比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e187096. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7096.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside for treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: A retrospective cohort study.头孢他啶/阿维巴坦单独或联合氨基糖苷类药物治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肠杆菌科感染:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2024 Nov;64(5):107321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107321. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
2
Mortality Among US Veterans Admitted to Community vs Veterans Health Administration Hospitals for COVID-19.美国退伍军人因 COVID-19 入住社区医院与退伍军人健康管理局医院的死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315902. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15902.
3
Patient preference and contraindications in measuring quality of care: what do administrative data miss?患者对医疗质量测量的偏好和禁忌:行政数据遗漏了什么?
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 20;31(21):2716-23. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.7473. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
4
Fee-based care is important for access to prompt treatment of hip fractures among veterans.按费用提供的医疗保健对于退伍军人髋部骨折的及时治疗获得至关重要。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):1047-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2783-3. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
5
Impact of length of stay after coronary bypass surgery on short-term readmission rate: an instrumental variable analysis.冠状动脉旁路手术后住院时间对短期再入院率的影响:工具变量分析。
Med Care. 2013 Jan;51(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318270bc13.
6
Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals.在私立医院接受冠状动脉血运重建术的退伍军人事务部患者的死亡率。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1802-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00720.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Length of stay as a source of bias in comparing performance in VA and private sector facilities: lessons learned from a regional evaluation of intensive care outcomes.在比较退伍军人事务部(VA)设施和私营部门设施的绩效时,住院时间作为偏差来源:从重症监护结果的区域评估中吸取的教训。
Med Care. 2001 Sep;39(9):1014-24. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200109000-00011.
2
Outsourcing on the upswing. Health providers are farming out more services to spend less money.外包业务呈上升趋势。医疗服务提供商正在外包更多服务以节省开支。
Mod Healthc. 2000 Sep 4;30(37):46-50, 52-4, 56-60.
3
Outcome of myocardial infarction in Veterans Health Administration patients as compared with medicare patients.退伍军人健康管理局患者与医疗保险患者心肌梗死的结局比较。
N Engl J Med. 2000 Dec 28;343(26):1934-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200012283432606.
4
Using severity-adjusted mortality to compare performance in a Veterans Affairs hospital and in private-sector hospitals.利用严重程度调整后的死亡率比较退伍军人事务医院和私立医院的绩效。
Am J Med Qual. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):207-11. doi: 10.1177/106286060001500505.
5
Increased risk of death in patients with do-not-resuscitate orders.有“不要复苏”医嘱的患者死亡风险增加。
Med Care. 1999 Aug;37(8):727-37. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199908000-00003.
6
Veteran's health care: time for a change?退伍军人医疗保健:是时候做出改变了吗?
Physician Exec. 1998 Nov-Dec;24(6):48-51.
7
Health-related quality of life as a predictor of mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Participants of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Processes, Structures, and Outcomes of Care in Cardiac Surgery.与健康相关的生活质量作为冠状动脉搭桥手术后死亡率的预测指标。退伍军人事务部心脏外科护理流程、结构和结果合作研究组的参与者。
JAMA. 1999 Apr 14;281(14):1298-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.14.1298.
8
Interpreting risk-adjusted length of stay patterns for VA hospitals.解读退伍军人事务部医院的风险调整住院时长模式。
Med Care. 1998 Dec;36(12):1660-75. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199812000-00004.
9
Severity-adjusted mortality and length of stay in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. Results of a regional study.教学医院和非教学医院中经严重程度调整后的死亡率及住院时间。一项区域研究的结果。
JAMA. 1997 Aug 13;278(6):485-90.
10
Declines in hospital mortality associated with a regional initiative to measure hospital performance.与一项衡量医院绩效的区域倡议相关的医院死亡率下降。
Am J Med Qual. 1997 Summer;12(2):103-12. doi: 10.1177/0885713X9701200204.