Fagan Mark J, Griffith Rebecca A, Obbard Laura, O'Connor Carolyn J
Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Aug;18(8):652-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20821.x.
To determine if a literature-based physical diagnosis curriculum could improve student knowledge, skill, and self-confidence in physical diagnosis.
Prospective controlled trial of an educational intervention.
Required internal medicine clerkship for third-year medical students at Brown Medical School.
Third-year medical students who completed the internal medicine clerkship during the academic year 1999-2000: 32 students at 1 clerkship site received the intervention; a total of 50 students at 3 other clerkship sites served as controls.
Physical diagnosis curriculum based on 8 articles from the Journal of the American Medical Association's Rational Clinical Examination series. Intervention students met weekly for 1 hour with a preceptor to review each article, discuss the sensitivity and specificity of the maneuvers and findings, and practice the techniques with an inpatient who agreed to be visited and examined.
Physical diagnosis knowledge for the 8 topics was evaluated using a 22-item multiple choice question quiz, skill was evaluated using trained evaluators, and self-confidence was assessed using an end-of-clerkship survey. Intervention students scored significantly higher than the control group on the knowledge quiz (mean correct score 70% vs 63%, P =.002), skills assessment (mean correct score 90% vs 54%, P <.001), and self-confidence score (mean total score 40 vs 35, P =.003), and they expressed greater satisfaction with the physical diagnosis teaching they received in the clerkship.
This physical diagnosis curriculum was successful in improving students' knowledge, skill, and self-confidence in physical diagnosis.
确定基于文献的物理诊断课程能否提高学生在物理诊断方面的知识、技能和自信心。
教育干预的前瞻性对照试验。
布朗医学院三年级医学生必修的内科实习课。
在1999 - 2000学年完成内科实习的三年级医学生:1个实习地点的32名学生接受了干预;其他3个实习地点的50名学生作为对照组。
基于《美国医学会杂志·理性临床检查》系列中的8篇文章设计的物理诊断课程。干预组学生每周与一名带教老师会面1小时,复习每篇文章,讨论操作和检查结果的敏感性和特异性,并与一名同意接受访视和检查的住院患者练习这些技术。
使用22道多项选择题测验评估8个主题的物理诊断知识,使用经过培训的评估人员评估技能,并通过实习结束时的调查评估自信心。干预组学生在知识测验(平均正确得分70%对63%,P = 0.002)、技能评估(平均正确得分90%对54%,P < 0.001)和自信心得分(平均总分40对35,P = 0.003)方面显著高于对照组,并且他们对实习期间接受的物理诊断教学表示更满意。
该物理诊断课程成功提高了学生在物理诊断方面的知识、技能和自信心。