Hintze H, Wenzel A, Andreasen F M, Swerin I
Institute of Oral Medicine and Diagnosis, Royal Dental College Aarhus.
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1992 Aug;8(4):149-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1992.tb00234.x.
A previous study of the sensitivity and accuracy of a standardized radiographic technique for the disclosure of root cavities in a cadaver material indicated that it was not possible to perceive small artificial "resorption" cavities. Using the same material, the aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the use of subtraction radiography would improve the detection of root cavities. In an autopsy material of five mandibular blocks each containing two premolars, small, medium, and large cavities were drilled in the cervical, middle, and apical thirds of the proximal and oral root surfaces. Each jaw block was radiographed before (B) and after (A) cavity preparation with three different exposure times resulting in light, medium, and dark film densities. The radiographs were digitized. Digital subtraction was performed between the A- and B images of varying densities by a computer program developed for dental subtraction radiography. Conventional and reverse contrast modes of the subtraction image were assessed independently by four observers. The results showed small inter- and intraobserver differences in diagnostic accuracy for assessment of total number of root cavities. Original film density did not influence the diagnostic performance in the resulting subtraction image. Contrast mode in the subtraction image influenced diagnostic performance as the majority of observers did best with the reverse contrast mode (p < 0.05). Some of the small root cavities were disclosed by the subtraction technique, but overall accuracy was not increased compared to conventional radiography.
先前一项关于标准化放射技术在尸体材料中显示牙根空洞的敏感性和准确性的研究表明,无法察觉小的人工“吸收”空洞。使用相同的材料,本研究的目的是评估使用减影放射摄影是否会提高牙根空洞的检测率。在一个包含五个下颌骨块、每个下颌骨块含有两颗前磨牙的尸检材料中,在近中牙根表面和口腔牙根表面的颈部、中部和根尖三分之一处钻出小、中、大三种尺寸的空洞。每个颌骨块在制备空洞之前(B)和之后(A)分别进行放射摄影,采用三种不同的曝光时间,得到低密度、中密度和高密度的胶片影像。这些射线照片被数字化。通过为牙科减影放射摄影开发的计算机程序,对不同密度的A图像和B图像进行数字减法运算。四名观察者分别独立评估减法图像的常规和反转对比模式。结果显示,观察者之间和观察者内部在评估牙根空洞总数的诊断准确性方面差异较小。原始胶片密度对所得减法图像的诊断性能没有影响。减法图像的对比模式影响诊断性能,因为大多数观察者在反转对比模式下表现最佳(p < 0.05)。减影技术揭示了一些小的牙根空洞,但与传统放射摄影相比,总体准确性并未提高。