Rao D H, Sarma K V, Kumar S, Reddy C G, Roa N P
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderabad.
Indian Pediatr. 1992 Dec;29(12):1513-8.
Acceptability trials with three types of recipes was carried out on 184 young preschoolers (6 months to 35 months) residing in four nearby villages around Hyderabad. Results of this study indicated that among the 3 types of supplementary foods (Sweet Ready Mix, Sweet Ready Mix with Amylase and Therapeutic food tested here, the Therapeutic food was more acceptable (taste, smell and bulk) to the children. The criteria for acceptability of the food was defined as the ability of 75% of the children to consume 75% or more of the food supplement at one sitting for 70% of the days of the trial. The Therapeutic food, a calorie dense supplement, met the above criteria. The acceptability was poor for the Sweet Ready Mix and Sweet Ready Mix with Amylase (< 4%) mainly due to quantity rather than taste and smell as revealed by the mothers. The mothers of the children also liked the taste and smell of the therapeutic food better. Consumption of the therapeutic food caused minimal side effects like diarrhea and vomiting when compared to side effects after eating Sweet Ready Mix and Sweet Ready Mix with Amylase in children.
在海得拉巴附近四个村庄居住的184名学龄前儿童(6个月至35个月)中,对三种类型的食谱进行了可接受性试验。这项研究的结果表明,在这三种补充食品(在此测试的甜速溶混合物、含淀粉酶的甜速溶混合物和治疗性食品)中,治疗性食品在口味、气味和体积方面更受儿童接受。食品可接受性的标准定义为,在试验的70%天数里,75%的儿童一次能吃下75%或更多的食品补充剂。治疗性食品作为一种高热量补充剂,符合上述标准。甜速溶混合物和含淀粉酶的甜速溶混合物的可接受性较差(<4%),主要原因是量的问题,而不是母亲们所反映的口味和气味问题。儿童的母亲们也更喜欢治疗性食品的口味和气味。与食用甜速溶混合物和含淀粉酶的甜速溶混合物后儿童出现的副作用相比,食用治疗性食品引起的腹泻和呕吐等副作用最小。