Doorduijn J K, van der Holt B, van Imhoff G W, van der Hem K G, Kramer M H H, van Oers M H J, Ossenkoppele G J, Schaafsma M R, Verdonck L F, Verhoef G E G, Steijaert M M C, Buijt I, Uyl-de Groot C A, van Agthoven M, Mulder A H, Sonneveld P
Department of Hematology, Erasmus Medisch Centrum Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 15;21(16):3041-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.076.
To investigate whether the relative dose-intensity of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy could be improved by prophylactic administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).
Patients aged 65 to 90 years (median, 72 years) with stage II to IV aggressive NHL were randomly assigned to receive standard CHOP every 3 weeks or CHOP plus G-CSF every 3 weeks on days 2 to 11 of each cycle.
In 389 eligible patients, the relative dose intensities (RDIs) of cyclophosphamide (median, 96.3% v 93.9%; P =.01) and doxorubicin (median, 95.4% v 93.3%; P =.04) were higher in patients treated with CHOP plus G-CSF. The complete response rates were 55% and 52% for CHOP and CHOP plus G-CSF, respectively (P =.63). The actuarial overall survival at 5 years was 22% with CHOP alone, compared with 24% with CHOP plus G-CSF (P =.76), with a median follow-up of 33 months. Patients treated with CHOP plus G-CSF had an identical incidence of infections, with World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 (34 of 1,191 cycles v 36 of 1,195 cycles). Only the cumulative days with antibiotics were fewer with CHOP plus G-CSF (median, 0 v 6 days; P =.006) than with CHOP alone. The number of hospital admissions and the number of days in hospital were not different.
In elderly patients, G-CSF improved the RDI of CHOP, but this did not lead to a higher complete response rate or better overall survival. G-CSF did not prevent serious infections.
探讨在老年侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者中,预防性应用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)是否能提高环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP)化疗的相对剂量强度。
年龄在65至90岁(中位年龄72岁)的II至IV期侵袭性NHL患者被随机分配,每3周接受一次标准CHOP方案治疗,或在每个周期的第2至11天每3周接受CHOP加G-CSF治疗。
在389例符合条件的患者中,接受CHOP加G-CSF治疗的患者,环磷酰胺(中位值,96.3%对93.9%;P = 0.01)和多柔比星(中位值,95.4%对93.3%;P = 0.04) 的相对剂量强度(RDI)更高。CHOP方案和CHOP加G-CSF方案的完全缓解率分别为55%和52%(P = 0.63)。单独使用CHOP方案5年的精算总生存率为22%,CHOP加G-CSF方案为24%(P = 0.76),中位随访时间为33个月。接受CHOP加G-CSF治疗的患者感染发生率相同,世界卫生组织3至4级感染发生率(1191个周期中有34次,1195个周期中有36次)。只有CHOP加G-CSF方案使用抗生素的累计天数较少(中位值,0天对6天;P = 0.006),单独使用CHOP方案则较多。住院次数和住院天数没有差异。
在老年患者中,G-CSF提高了CHOP方案的RDI,但这并未导致更高的完全缓解率或更好的总生存率。G-CSF不能预防严重感染。