Lafosse C, Kerckhofs E, Troch M, Vandenbussche E
Scientific Unit Rehabilitation Centre 'Hof ter Schelde', Antwerp, Belgium.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 May;25(3):308-23. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.3.308.13807.
In many paradigms of stimulation techniques aimed at reducing hemispatial neglect, somatosensory and proprioceptive stimulation are often interchanged, although the anatomical and functional pathways transmitting these signals are clearly different. Therefore, we have investigated the effects of one somatosensory stimulation technique, the cyclic pressure application (CPA), and have compared them with the effects of left transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) on the expression of left hemispatial neglect in 13 stroke patients, as assessed by two visuospatial exploration tasks: the Star Cancellation task and Schenkenberg's Line Bisection task. In a first experiment, four treatment conditions were given: TENS, CPA, TENS + CPA, as well as a placebo condition. For each patient, the intensity of the TENS was determined, based on his/her conscious somatosensory threshold for the electrical impulses. In order to determine whether unconscious proprioceptive afferent information instead of exteroceptive somatosensory stimulation is a sufficient condition to improve hemispatial neglect, we carried out a second experiment, only with patients suffering from complete somatosensory loss. The effects of the different treatments were investigated, using the same sequence as for Experiment 1, but, this time, the applied intensity of TENS was manipulated over two conditions : (1) one in which the intensity of TENS stimulation was below the motor (proprioceptive) threshold and (2) one in which the intensity was determined following the degree of proprioceptive stimulation demonstrated by the point at which a visible muscle contraction during the stimulation could be elicited. The results demonstrated that proprioceptive-based TENS stimulation is a sufficient condition to reduce hemispatial neglect, even when a severe somatosensory loss was present.
在许多旨在减轻半侧空间忽视的刺激技术范式中,体感刺激和本体感觉刺激常常相互替换使用,尽管传递这些信号的解剖学和功能通路明显不同。因此,我们研究了一种体感刺激技术——循环压力施加(CPA)的效果,并将其与左经皮电刺激(TENS)对13名中风患者左侧半侧空间忽视表现的影响进行了比较,通过两项视觉空间探索任务进行评估:星形删除任务和申肯伯格直线二等分任务。在第一个实验中,设置了四种治疗条件:TENS、CPA、TENS + CPA以及安慰剂条件。对于每位患者,根据其对电脉冲的有意识体感阈值来确定TENS的强度。为了确定无意识的本体感觉传入信息而非外感受性体感刺激是否是改善半侧空间忽视的充分条件,我们进行了第二个实验,仅针对完全体感丧失的患者。使用与实验1相同的顺序研究不同治疗的效果,但这次,TENS的施加强度在两种条件下进行调整:(1)一种是TENS刺激强度低于运动(本体感觉)阈值;(2)一种是根据刺激过程中能引发可见肌肉收缩的点所显示的本体感觉刺激程度来确定强度。结果表明,基于本体感觉的TENS刺激是减轻半侧空间忽视的充分条件,即使存在严重的体感丧失。