Suppr超能文献

特定患者开放性眼球损伤的局部麻醉与镇静联合应用

Combined topical anesthesia and sedation for open-globe injuries in selected patients.

作者信息

Boscia Francesco, La Tegola Maria Gabriella, Columbo Giuseppe, Alessio Giovanni, Sborgia Carlo

机构信息

Dipartimento di Oftalmologia ed Otorinolaringoiatria, Università di Bari, Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2003 Aug;110(8):1555-9. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00485-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topical anesthesia (TA) and IV sedation in surgery for less severe open-globe injury (OGI).

DESIGN

Noncomparative consecutive interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Of 67 OGI cases reviewed at the Department of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy, in the period from 1999 to 2000, 10 eyes (14.9%) of 10 consecutive patients (age range, 6-58 years) were repaired using TA and IV sedation. All patients belonged to the American Society of Anesthesiologists risk class I or II. Nine eyes had corneoscleral wounds, four had vitreous loss, two had traumatic cataract, and three had an intraocular foreign body (IOFB); one patient had interruption of a continuous penetrating keratoplasty suture. Preoperatively, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from hand movement to 20/20.

INTERVENTION

Corneoscleral suture was performed in nine patients, vitreous excision in four, uveal excision or reposition in four, IOFB removal in three, and cataract extraction in two; corneal button resuture was carried out in one patient. All patients received topical oxybuprocaine hydrochloride 0.4%, and IV propofol, midazolam, and fentanyl for anesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The change in BCVA was evaluated. Within 24 hours after surgery, each patient was asked to grade subjective pain and discomfort on a 4-point scale. The surgeon was asked to report difficulties attributable to the operating conditions. Complications related to anesthesia and to surgery were assessed.

RESULTS

Best-corrected visual acuity stabilized or improved in all patients. All patients had grade 1 pain and discomfort during most of the procedure. All patients had grade 2 (mild) pain and discomfort during external bipolar cautery and conjunctival closure. No patient required additional anesthesia. The operating conditions as reported by the surgeons were graded slightly difficult in all cases but one, which was graded moderately difficult. No patient had surgical or anesthesia-related adverse events or life-threatening complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical anesthesia and IV sedation are safe and effective and could be a reasonable alternative for less severe OGI. The degree of patient discomfort is only marginal during surgery and postoperatively. However, surgical training and patient preparation are the keys to the safe use of this anesthetic modality.

摘要

目的

评估局部麻醉(TA)联合静脉镇静用于不太严重的开放性眼球损伤(OGI)手术的有效性和安全性。

设计

非对照连续性介入病例系列。

参与者

1999年至2000年期间,在意大利巴里大学眼科和耳鼻喉科接受检查的67例OGI病例中,连续10例患者(年龄范围6 - 58岁)的10只眼(14.9%)采用TA联合静脉镇静进行修复。所有患者均属于美国麻醉医师协会风险分级I或II级。9只眼角巩膜伤口,4只眼玻璃体丢失,2只眼外伤性白内障,3只眼眼内异物(IOFB);1例患者连续穿透性角膜移植缝线中断。术前,最佳矫正视力(BCVA)范围从手动到20/20。

干预

9例患者进行角巩膜缝合,4例进行玻璃体切除,4例进行葡萄膜切除或复位,3例进行IOFB取出,2例进行白内障摘除;1例患者进行角膜纽扣重新缝合。所有患者均接受0.4%盐酸奥布卡因局部用药,以及丙泊酚、咪达唑仑和芬太尼静脉注射用于麻醉。

主要观察指标

评估BCVA的变化。术后24小时内,要求每位患者用4分制对主观疼痛和不适进行分级。要求外科医生报告因手术条件导致的困难。评估与麻醉和手术相关的并发症。

结果

所有患者的最佳矫正视力稳定或提高。所有患者在手术大部分过程中疼痛和不适分级为1级。所有患者在外部双极电凝和结膜闭合期间疼痛和不适分级为2级(轻度)。没有患者需要额外麻醉。除1例分级为中度困难外,外科医生报告的所有手术条件分级均为轻度困难。没有患者发生手术或麻醉相关不良事件或危及生命的并发症。

结论

局部麻醉联合静脉镇静安全有效,对于不太严重的OGI可能是一种合理的替代方法。手术中和术后患者不适程度仅为轻微。然而,手术培训和患者准备是安全使用这种麻醉方式的关键。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验