Bergman Daniel A, Moore Paul A
Department of Biological Sciences and the J P Scott Center for Neuroscience, Mind, and Behavior, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio 43403, USA.
Biol Bull. 2003 Aug;205(1):26-35. doi: 10.2307/1543442.
Agonistic behavior is a fundamental aspect of ecological theories on resource acquisition and sexual selection. Crustaceans are exemplary models for agonistic behavior within the laboratory, but agonistic behavior in natural habitats is often neglected. Laboratory studies do not achieve the same ecological realism as field studies. In an attempt to connect laboratory results to field data and investigate how habitat structure affects agonistic interactions, the nocturnal behavior of two crayfish species was observed by scuba diving and snorkeling in two northern Michigan lakes. Intraspecific agonistic interactions were analyzed in three habitats: two food resources-macrophytes and detritus-and one sheltered habitat. The overall observations reinforce the concept that resources influence agonistic bouts. Fights in the presence of shelters were longer and more intense, suggesting that shelters have a higher perceived value than food resources. Fights in the presence of detritus patches had higher average intensities and ended with more tailflips away from an opponent, suggesting that detritus was a more valuable food resource than macrophytes. In addition, observations of aggressive behavior within a natural setting can add validity to laboratory studies. When fights in nature are compared with laboratory fights, those in nature are shorter, less intense, and less likely to end with a tailflip, but do show the fundamental fight dynamics associated with laboratory studies. Extrinsic and intrinsic factors affect intraspecific aggression in many ways, and both should always be recognized as having the potential to alter agonistic behavior.
攻击行为是资源获取和性选择生态理论的一个基本方面。甲壳类动物是实验室中攻击行为的典型模型,但自然栖息地中的攻击行为常常被忽视。实验室研究无法达到与实地研究相同的生态现实性。为了将实验室结果与实地数据联系起来,并研究栖息地结构如何影响攻击互动,通过在密歇根州北部的两个湖泊中进行水肺潜水和浮潜观察了两种小龙虾的夜间行为。在三种栖息地中分析了种内攻击互动:两种食物资源——大型水生植物和碎屑——以及一种有遮蔽的栖息地。总体观察结果强化了资源影响攻击回合的概念。在有遮蔽物的情况下的争斗时间更长、更激烈,这表明遮蔽物的感知价值高于食物资源。在有碎屑斑块的情况下的争斗平均强度更高,并且以更多地向对手方向翻转尾巴结束,这表明碎屑是比大型水生植物更有价值的食物资源。此外,在自然环境中对攻击行为的观察可以增加实验室研究的有效性。当将自然环境中的争斗与实验室争斗进行比较时,自然环境中的争斗更短、强度更低,并且不太可能以翻转尾巴结束,但确实显示出与实验室研究相关的基本争斗动态。外在和内在因素在许多方面影响种内攻击行为,并且两者都应始终被视为有可能改变攻击行为。