Cannon Christopher P
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 2003 Aug;26(8):358-64. doi: 10.1002/clc.4950260803.
With the central importance of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and the numerous positive trials with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIa inhibitors given intravenously, it was hoped that one could extend the benefit of IIb/IIIa inhibition to long-term treatment. Although the hypothesis that prolonged oral IIb/IIIa inhibition was appealing, many issues have been identified in the initial Phase II trials that would limit the usefulness of these compounds. Variability of the level of platelet inhibition was one major culprit that distinguished the oral compounds from intravenous ones. The problems that arose were that increased bleeding has been seen when levels of platelet inhibition are high (e.g., > 90%) and that, conversely, efficacy would likely be limited when levels of platelet inhibition were low. If further development of this class of drugs is undertaken, formal dosing studies would have to establish an oral dosing strategy that achieves appropriately high (80-95% inhibition) and steady levels of inhibition.
鉴于抗血小板治疗在冠状动脉疾病患者中的核心重要性以及静脉注射糖蛋白(GP)IIb/IIa抑制剂的众多阳性试验结果,人们希望能够将IIb/IIIa抑制的益处扩展到长期治疗。尽管长期口服IIb/IIIa抑制这一假说很有吸引力,但在最初的II期试验中发现了许多问题,这些问题将限制这些化合物的实用性。血小板抑制水平的变异性是区分口服化合物与静脉注射化合物的一个主要原因。出现的问题是,当血小板抑制水平较高(如>90%)时会出现出血增加的情况,相反,当血小板抑制水平较低时,疗效可能会受到限制。如果要对这类药物进行进一步研发,正式的剂量研究必须确立一种口服给药策略,以实现适当高的(80-95%抑制)和稳定的抑制水平。