Gaubitz Markus, Schneider K Matthias
Medical Clinic B, Westphalian Wilhelms-University, Münster, Germany.
Ther Apher Dial. 2003 Apr;7(2):183-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-0968.2003.00040.x.
In the last 30 years, several studies have documented the effect of plamapheresis and immunoadsorption in eliminating pathogenic autoantibodies (AB) and immune complexes (IC) from circulation of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, these extracorporeal therapies are still not accepted as first line options, which may be because of existing controlled studies failing to confirm any obvious benefit. Immunoadsorption offers some advantages compared with plasmapheresis, but until today only the avoidance of any substitution fluids has really been used. The new therapeutic options given by immunoadsorbers--a continuous application in acute disease states or chronic use instead of immunosuppressive drugs--have still to be evaluated in systemic autoimmune diseases. To date published studies of immunoadsorption in patients with SLE reveal good efficacy in a majority of patients combined with excellent biocompatibility. Randomized controlled trials are mandatory to give continued support to the therapeutic opportunities offered only by immunoadsorption; the limited number of patients suitable for this therapy necessitates multicentric cooperation.
在过去30年里,多项研究记录了血浆置换和免疫吸附在清除系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者循环系统中的致病性自身抗体(AB)和免疫复合物(IC)方面的作用。然而,这些体外治疗方法仍未被视为一线选择,这可能是因为现有的对照研究未能证实其有任何明显益处。与血浆置换相比,免疫吸附具有一些优势,但直到如今,真正得到应用的只有避免使用任何置换液这一点。免疫吸附器提供的新治疗选择——在急性疾病状态下持续应用或长期使用以替代免疫抑制药物——仍有待在系统性自身免疫性疾病中进行评估。迄今为止,关于SLE患者免疫吸附治疗的已发表研究表明,大多数患者疗效良好,且生物相容性极佳。必须开展随机对照试验,以持续支持仅由免疫吸附提供的治疗机会;适合这种治疗的患者数量有限,因此需要多中心合作。