Hughes David, Griffiths Lesley
Centre for Health Economics and Policy Studies, University of Wales Swansea.
Sociol Health Illn. 2003 Sep;25(6):571-88. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00359.
This paper considers how middle-level managers in British Health Authorities and hospital Trusts orient to media reportage in the process of negotiating and monitoring contracts for clinical services. Although they sometimes produce media representations aimed at influencing the general public, local policy actors on both sides of the purchaser/provider split also use media messages as part of their negotiations with each other. We examine how they seek to manage negative publicity, and what happens when one side threatens to 'go public'. Managers must strike a balance between negotiating advantage and maintaining organisational relationships. Thus the powerful, but potentially double-edged, weapon of public disclosure was usually broached in indirect terms, and approached with some ambivalence. In rare cases, parties resorted to hostile press releases as relationships deteriorated. Arguably, these interactions reflect more general tensions that arise when managerial discourses, emphasising concepts such as adversarial contracting, markets and competition, are imported into professional organisations with a public service mission.
本文探讨了英国卫生当局和医院信托机构的中层管理人员在协商和监督临床服务合同时,如何应对媒体报道。尽管他们有时会制作旨在影响公众的媒体形象,但购买方/提供方双方的地方政策行为者也将媒体信息作为彼此谈判的一部分。我们研究了他们如何设法应对负面宣传,以及当一方威胁要“公开”时会发生什么。管理人员必须在争取谈判优势和维护组织关系之间取得平衡。因此,公开披露这一强大但可能双刃剑的武器通常是以间接方式提及的,并且处理时带有一定的矛盾心理。在极少数情况下,随着关系恶化,各方会诉诸敌意的新闻稿。可以说,这些互动反映了在强调诸如对抗性合同、市场和竞争等概念的管理话语被引入具有公共服务使命的专业组织时所产生的更普遍的紧张关系。