• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公开化:英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)合同谈判中对新闻媒体的提及。

Going public: references to the news media in NHS contract negotiations.

作者信息

Hughes David, Griffiths Lesley

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics and Policy Studies, University of Wales Swansea.

出版信息

Sociol Health Illn. 2003 Sep;25(6):571-88. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00359.

DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.00359
PMID:12919446
Abstract

This paper considers how middle-level managers in British Health Authorities and hospital Trusts orient to media reportage in the process of negotiating and monitoring contracts for clinical services. Although they sometimes produce media representations aimed at influencing the general public, local policy actors on both sides of the purchaser/provider split also use media messages as part of their negotiations with each other. We examine how they seek to manage negative publicity, and what happens when one side threatens to 'go public'. Managers must strike a balance between negotiating advantage and maintaining organisational relationships. Thus the powerful, but potentially double-edged, weapon of public disclosure was usually broached in indirect terms, and approached with some ambivalence. In rare cases, parties resorted to hostile press releases as relationships deteriorated. Arguably, these interactions reflect more general tensions that arise when managerial discourses, emphasising concepts such as adversarial contracting, markets and competition, are imported into professional organisations with a public service mission.

摘要

本文探讨了英国卫生当局和医院信托机构的中层管理人员在协商和监督临床服务合同时,如何应对媒体报道。尽管他们有时会制作旨在影响公众的媒体形象,但购买方/提供方双方的地方政策行为者也将媒体信息作为彼此谈判的一部分。我们研究了他们如何设法应对负面宣传,以及当一方威胁要“公开”时会发生什么。管理人员必须在争取谈判优势和维护组织关系之间取得平衡。因此,公开披露这一强大但可能双刃剑的武器通常是以间接方式提及的,并且处理时带有一定的矛盾心理。在极少数情况下,随着关系恶化,各方会诉诸敌意的新闻稿。可以说,这些互动反映了在强调诸如对抗性合同、市场和竞争等概念的管理话语被引入具有公共服务使命的专业组织时所产生的更普遍的紧张关系。

相似文献

1
Going public: references to the news media in NHS contract negotiations.公开化:英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)合同谈判中对新闻媒体的提及。
Sociol Health Illn. 2003 Sep;25(6):571-88. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00359.
2
Emergence of three general practitioner contracting-in models in South Africa: a qualitative multi-case study.南非三种全科医生签约模式的出现:一项定性多案例研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Oct 5;17(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0830-0.
3
Co-operation and conflict under hard and soft contracting regimes: case studies from England and Wales.硬合同和软合同机制下的合作与冲突:来自英格兰和威尔士的案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-S1-S7. Epub 2013 May 24.
4
Health care contracts in Britain and the United States: a case for technology transfer?英国和美国的医疗保健合同:技术转让的案例?
J Nurs Manag. 1995 Nov;3(6):287-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.1995.tb00110.x.
5
The British health care reforms, the American health care revolution, and purchaser/provider contracts.英国医疗保健改革、美国医疗保健革命与购买者/提供者合同。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Winter;20(4):885-908. doi: 10.1215/03616878-20-4-885.
6
Contracting for quality: does length matter?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Oct;4(4):220-5. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400407.
7
Establishing a contract for a PACS managed service.
Clin Radiol. 2002 Mar;57(3):178-83. doi: 10.1053/crad.2001.0901.
8
Talking contracts and taking care: managers and professionals in the British National Health Service internal market.谈论合同与关怀:英国国民医疗服务体系内部市场中的管理者与专业人员
Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jul;51(2):209-22. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00448-7.
9
Choice of contracts in the British National Health Service: an empirical study.英国国民医疗服务体系中合同的选择:一项实证研究。
J Health Econ. 2008 Sep;27(5):1155-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.05.005. Epub 2008 May 20.
10
Commissioning. Share options.
Health Serv J. 1998 Sep 10;108(5621):22-4.