English Dallas R, Burton Robert C, del Mar Chris B, Donovan Robert J, Ireland Paul D, Emery Geoff
The Cancer Council Victoria, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia.
BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):375. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.375.
To determine whether an aid to the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions reduces the ratio of benign lesions to melanomas excised in general practice.
Controlled trial randomised by practice.
General practices in Perth, Western Australia.
468 general practitioners in 223 practices.
Intervention practices were given an algorithm and instant camera to assist with the diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions. All practices were given national guidelines on managing melanoma.
Ratio of benign pigmented lesions to melanomas excised. Analyses conducted with and without inclusion of seborrhoeic keratoses.
At baseline the ratios of benign to malignant lesions were lower in the intervention group than in the control group. During the trial period the ratios were higher in the intervention group (19:1 v 17:1 without seborrhoeic keratoses and 29:1 v 26:1 with seborrhoeic keratoses). After adjustment for patients' age, sex, and socioeconomic status, the ratio was 1.02 times higher (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.51, P = 0.94) in the intervention group when seborrhoeic keratoses were not included and 1.03 times higher (0.71 to 1.50, P = 0.88) when seborrhoeic keratoses were included. General practitioners in the intervention group were less likely than those in the control group to excise the most recent pigmented skin lesion they managed (22% v 48%, P < 0.001) and to refer the patient to a specialist (16% v 27%, P = 0.06).
Provision of the algorithm and camera did not decrease the ratio of benign pigmented skin lesions to melanomas excised by general practitioners.
确定一种色素沉着性皮肤病变的诊断辅助工具是否能降低全科医疗中切除的良性病变与黑色素瘤的比例。
按诊所进行随机对照试验。
西澳大利亚州珀斯的全科诊所。
223家诊所的468名全科医生。
向干预组诊所提供一种算法和即时相机,以协助诊断色素沉着性皮肤病变。所有诊所均获得了黑色素瘤管理的国家指南。
切除的良性色素沉着性病变与黑色素瘤的比例。分析时分别纳入和未纳入脂溢性角化病。
基线时,干预组的良性与恶性病变比例低于对照组。在试验期间,干预组的比例更高(不包括脂溢性角化病时为19:1对17:1,包括脂溢性角化病时为29:1对26:1)。在对患者的年龄、性别和社会经济地位进行调整后,不包括脂溢性角化病时,干预组的比例高1.02倍(95%置信区间0.68至1.51,P = 0.94),包括脂溢性角化病时高1.03倍(0.71至1.50,P = 0.88)。干预组的全科医生比对照组的医生切除他们所处理的最新色素沉着性皮肤病变的可能性更小(22%对48%,P < 0.001),将患者转诊给专科医生的可能性也更小(16%对27%,P = 0.06)。
提供算法和相机并未降低全科医生切除的良性色素沉着性皮肤病变与黑色素瘤的比例。