Tilly Herve, Lepage Eric, Coiffier Bertrand, Blanc Michel, Herbrecht Raoul, Bosly Andre, Attal Michel, Fillet Georges, Guettier Catherine, Molina Thierry Jo, Gisselbrecht Christian, Reyes Felix
Department of Hematology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France.
Blood. 2003 Dec 15;102(13):4284-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0542. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
We conducted a randomized trial to compare the intensive conventional chemotherapy regimen ACVBP (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, prednisone) with standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in previously untreated patients with poor-risk aggressive lymphoma. Patients aged 61 to 69 years who had aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma with at least one prognostic factor of the age-adjusted international prognostic index (IPI) were included. ACVBP consisted of an induction phase of intensified chemotherapy and central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis followed by a sequential consolidation phase. Of the 708 patients registered for the study, 635 were eligible. The rate of complete response was 58% in the ACVBP group and 56% in the CHOP group (P =.5). Treatment-related death occurred in 13% of the ACVBP group and 7% of the CHOP group (P =.014). At 5 years, the event-free survival was 39% in the ACVBP group and 29% in the CHOP group (P =.005). The overall survival was significantly longer for patients treated with ACVBP, at 5 years it was 46% compared with 38% for patients treated with CHOP (P =.036). CNS progressions or relapses were more frequent in the CHOP group (P =.004). Despite higher toxicity, the ACVBP regimen, used as first-line treatment for patients with poor-risk aggressive lymphoma, is superior to standard CHOP with regard to both event-free survival and overall survival.
我们进行了一项随机试验,比较强化传统化疗方案ACVBP(阿霉素、环磷酰胺、长春地辛、博来霉素、泼尼松)与标准CHOP方案(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱、泼尼松)在先前未接受治疗的高危侵袭性淋巴瘤患者中的疗效。纳入年龄在61至69岁、患有侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤且至少具有一项年龄校正国际预后指数(IPI)预后因素的患者。ACVBP方案包括强化化疗诱导期和中枢神经系统(CNS)预防,随后是序贯巩固期。在登记参加该研究的708例患者中,635例符合条件。ACVBP组的完全缓解率为58%,CHOP组为56%(P = 0.5)。ACVBP组治疗相关死亡率为13%,CHOP组为7%(P = 0.014)。5年时,ACVBP组的无事件生存率为39%,CHOP组为29%(P = 0.005)。接受ACVBP治疗的患者总生存期显著更长,5年时为46%,而接受CHOP治疗的患者为38%(P = 0.036)。CHOP组中枢神经系统进展或复发更为频繁(P = 0.004)。尽管毒性更高,但ACVBP方案作为高危侵袭性淋巴瘤患者的一线治疗方案,在无事件生存率和总生存期方面均优于标准CHOP方案。