• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化传统化疗(ACVBP方案)与标准CHOP方案治疗预后不良的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较。

Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

作者信息

Tilly Herve, Lepage Eric, Coiffier Bertrand, Blanc Michel, Herbrecht Raoul, Bosly Andre, Attal Michel, Fillet Georges, Guettier Catherine, Molina Thierry Jo, Gisselbrecht Christian, Reyes Felix

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France.

出版信息

Blood. 2003 Dec 15;102(13):4284-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0542. Epub 2003 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1182/blood-2003-02-0542
PMID:12920037
Abstract

We conducted a randomized trial to compare the intensive conventional chemotherapy regimen ACVBP (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, prednisone) with standard CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in previously untreated patients with poor-risk aggressive lymphoma. Patients aged 61 to 69 years who had aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma with at least one prognostic factor of the age-adjusted international prognostic index (IPI) were included. ACVBP consisted of an induction phase of intensified chemotherapy and central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis followed by a sequential consolidation phase. Of the 708 patients registered for the study, 635 were eligible. The rate of complete response was 58% in the ACVBP group and 56% in the CHOP group (P =.5). Treatment-related death occurred in 13% of the ACVBP group and 7% of the CHOP group (P =.014). At 5 years, the event-free survival was 39% in the ACVBP group and 29% in the CHOP group (P =.005). The overall survival was significantly longer for patients treated with ACVBP, at 5 years it was 46% compared with 38% for patients treated with CHOP (P =.036). CNS progressions or relapses were more frequent in the CHOP group (P =.004). Despite higher toxicity, the ACVBP regimen, used as first-line treatment for patients with poor-risk aggressive lymphoma, is superior to standard CHOP with regard to both event-free survival and overall survival.

摘要

我们进行了一项随机试验,比较强化传统化疗方案ACVBP(阿霉素、环磷酰胺、长春地辛、博来霉素、泼尼松)与标准CHOP方案(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱、泼尼松)在先前未接受治疗的高危侵袭性淋巴瘤患者中的疗效。纳入年龄在61至69岁、患有侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤且至少具有一项年龄校正国际预后指数(IPI)预后因素的患者。ACVBP方案包括强化化疗诱导期和中枢神经系统(CNS)预防,随后是序贯巩固期。在登记参加该研究的708例患者中,635例符合条件。ACVBP组的完全缓解率为58%,CHOP组为56%(P = 0.5)。ACVBP组治疗相关死亡率为13%,CHOP组为7%(P = 0.014)。5年时,ACVBP组的无事件生存率为39%,CHOP组为29%(P = 0.005)。接受ACVBP治疗的患者总生存期显著更长,5年时为46%,而接受CHOP治疗的患者为38%(P = 0.036)。CHOP组中枢神经系统进展或复发更为频繁(P = 0.004)。尽管毒性更高,但ACVBP方案作为高危侵袭性淋巴瘤患者的一线治疗方案,在无事件生存率和总生存期方面均优于标准CHOP方案。

相似文献

1
Intensive conventional chemotherapy (ACVBP regimen) compared with standard CHOP for poor-prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma.强化传统化疗(ACVBP方案)与标准CHOP方案治疗预后不良的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较。
Blood. 2003 Dec 15;102(13):4284-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0542. Epub 2003 Aug 14.
2
Intensified chemotherapy with ACVBP plus rituximab versus standard CHOP plus rituximab for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-2B): an open-label randomised phase 3 trial.ACVBP 强化化疗联合利妥昔单抗对比标准 CHOP 联合利妥昔单抗治疗弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LNH03-2B):一项开放标签、随机、3 期临床试验。
Lancet. 2011 Nov 26;378(9806):1858-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61040-4.
3
ACVBP versus CHOP plus radiotherapy for localized aggressive lymphoma.ACVBP方案与CHOP方案加放疗治疗局限性侵袭性淋巴瘤的比较
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 24;352(12):1197-205. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042040.
4
Randomized comparison of ACVBP and m-BACOD in the treatment of patients with low-risk aggressive lymphoma: the LNH87-1 study. Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.ACVBP与m-BACOD治疗低危侵袭性淋巴瘤患者的随机对照研究:LNH87-1研究。成人淋巴瘤研究组。
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Mar;18(6):1309-15. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.6.1309.
5
Phase III study of ACVBP versus ACVBP plus rituximab for patients with localized low-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-1B).ACVBP 与 ACVBP 联合利妥昔单抗治疗局限性低危弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LNH03-1B)的 III 期研究。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Apr;24(4):1032-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds600. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
6
Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.标准方案(CHOP)与三种强化化疗方案治疗晚期非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404.
7
Randomized phase II study of biweekly CHOP and dose-escalated CHOP with prophylactic use of lenograstim (glycosylated G-CSF) in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study 9505.侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者接受每两周一次CHOP方案及剂量递增CHOP方案联合预防性使用来格司亭(糖基化粒细胞集落刺激因子)的随机II期研究:日本临床肿瘤学组研究9505
Ann Oncol. 2002 Sep;13(9):1347-55. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf287.
8
Shortened first-line high-dose chemotherapy for patients with poor-prognosis aggressive lymphoma.
J Clin Oncol. 2002 May 15;20(10):2472-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.02.125.
9
A phase 2 trial of CHOP chemotherapy followed by tositumomab/iodine I 131 tositumomab for previously untreated follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Southwest Oncology Group Protocol S9911.一项针对既往未经治疗的滤泡性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,采用CHOP化疗后序贯托西莫单抗/碘I 131托西莫单抗的2期试验:西南肿瘤协作组方案S9911。
Blood. 2003 Sep 1;102(5):1606-12. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-01-0287. Epub 2003 May 8.
10
Phase III trial of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) versus cisplatin, etoposide, bleomycin and prednisone (CisEBP) for the treatment of advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma of high grade malignancy. The Danish Lymphoma Study Group.环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松(CHOP方案)对比顺铂、依托泊苷、博来霉素和泼尼松(CisEBP方案)治疗晚期高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的III期试验。丹麦淋巴瘤研究组。
Acta Oncol. 1990;29(8):995-9. doi: 10.3109/02841869009091789.

引用本文的文献

1
The management of newly diagnosed large B-cell lymphoma: A British Society for Haematology Guideline.新诊断的大B细胞淋巴瘤的管理:英国血液学学会指南
Br J Haematol. 2024 Apr;204(4):1178-1192. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19273. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
2
Recent updates on central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.高危弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中枢神经系统预防的最新进展。
Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024 Jan 3;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40164-023-00467-2.
3
Central Nervous System Relapse in T and NK cell Lymphomas.
T细胞和NK细胞淋巴瘤的中枢神经系统复发
Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2023 Dec;18(6):243-251. doi: 10.1007/s11899-023-00710-x. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
4
A model to predict the prognosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma based on ultrasound images.基于超声图像预测弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤预后的模型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 27;13(1):3346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30533-y.
5
Central Nervous System Progression/Relapse in Mature T- and NK-Cell Lymphomas.成熟T细胞和NK细胞淋巴瘤的中枢神经系统进展/复发
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;15(3):925. doi: 10.3390/cancers15030925.
6
Central nervous system relapse in younger patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a LYSA and GLA/DSHNHL analysis.年轻弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中枢神经系统复发:LYSA 和 GLA/DSHNHL 分析。
Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 8;7(15):3968-3977. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008888.
7
Outcomes after first-line immunochemotherapy for primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: a LYSA study.首发免疫化疗治疗原发性纵隔 B 细胞淋巴瘤的结果:LYSA 研究。
Blood Adv. 2021 Oct 12;5(19):3862-3872. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004778.
8
High-dose methotrexate is effective for prevention of isolated CNS relapse in diffuse large B cell lymphoma.大剂量甲氨蝶呤对预防弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤孤立性中枢神经系统复发有效。
Blood Cancer J. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):143. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00535-y.
9
Incidence of central nervous system relapses in patients with DLBCL treated with lenalidomide as maintenance after R-CHOP.接受来那度胺作为R-CHOP方案后维持治疗的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中枢神经系统复发的发生率
Blood Adv. 2021 Aug 10;5(15):2965-2968. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004766.
10
Prophylaxis with intrathecal or high-dose methotrexate in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and high risk of CNS relapse.鞘内或大剂量甲氨蝶呤预防弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤和中枢神经系统复发高危患者。
Blood Cancer J. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):113. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00506-3.