de Simone Giovanni, Devereux Richard B, Palmieri Vittorio, Bella Jonathan N, Oberman Albert, Kitzman Dalane W, Hopkins Paul N, Rao D C, Arnett Donna K
Department of Medicine, The New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.
J Hypertens. 2003 Sep;21(9):1747-52. doi: 10.1097/00004872-200309000-00025.
To evaluate the differences between using height(2.7) or fat-free mass for assessment of the appropriateness of left ventricular mass (LVM) in relation to hemodynamic load, and to evaluate the performance of Doppler as compared with M-mode-derived stroke volume for computation of predicted values of LVM.
Cross-sectional.
Population-based.
We studied 2299 participants from the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network Study (prevalent cardiovascular disease in 342).
Individual predicted values of LVM were generated by equations using sex, stroke work (systolic blood pressure x stroke volume by either Doppler or M-mode) and either height(2.7) or fat-free mass, as measures of body build, in 228 normotensive, non-obese, non-diabetic participants. Observed LVM was divided by the predicted value and evaluated as 'excess of LVM'.
Among 1957 participants without prevalent cardiovascular disease, obese individuals (n = 1008) were slightly younger than non-obese individuals, whereas diabetic participants (n = 294) were slightly older. Excess of LVM was positively related to body mass index (BMI), independently of echocardiographic method and measure of body build, especially when height(2.7) and m-mode stroke work were used, and was greatest in the presence of concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (P < 0.0001). Excess LVM by height(2.7) was progressively greater than that by fat-free mass, as BMI increased (P < 0.0001). In analyses of covariance of association of prevalent cardiovascular disease with age, sex, race, BMI, and excess of LVM (by each method), methods using height(2.7) were more associated with prevalent cardiovascular disease than were methods using fat-free mass (P < 0.02).
Deviation of LVM from values that compensate hemodynamic load can be similarly identified using different measures of body build and methods to generate stroke work. However, the use of height(2.7) to compute LVM as a percentage of that predicted appears to identify deviations from compensatory values that are independently related to prevalent cardiovascular disease more effectively than does the use of fat-free mass.
评估使用身高(2.7)或去脂体重来评估左心室质量(LVM)与血流动力学负荷的适配性之间的差异,并评估与M型超声心动图得出的每搏输出量相比,多普勒超声心动图在计算LVM预测值方面的性能。
横断面研究。
基于人群。
我们研究了来自高血压遗传流行病学网络研究的2299名参与者(其中342人患有心血管疾病)。
在228名血压正常、非肥胖、非糖尿病的参与者中,通过使用性别、每搏功(收缩压×通过多普勒或M型超声心动图得出的每搏输出量)以及身高(2.7)或去脂体重作为体型测量指标的方程,生成LVM的个体预测值。将观察到的LVM除以预测值,并评估为“LVM超标”。
在1957名无心血管疾病史的参与者中,肥胖个体(n = 1008)比非肥胖个体略年轻,而糖尿病参与者(n = 294)略年长。LVM超标与体重指数(BMI)呈正相关,独立于超声心动图方法和体型测量指标,尤其是在使用身高(2.7)和M型超声心动图得出的每搏功时,并且在存在同心性左心室肥厚时最为明显(P < 0.0001)。随着BMI增加,基于身高(2.7)的LVM超标逐渐大于基于去脂体重的LVM超标(P < 0.0001)。在对心血管疾病与年龄、性别、种族、BMI以及LVM超标(通过每种方法)之间关联的协方差分析中,使用身高(2.7)的方法比使用去脂体重的方法与心血管疾病的关联性更强(P < 0.02)。
使用不同的体型测量指标和生成每搏功的方法,可以类似地识别LVM与补偿血流动力学负荷的值之间的偏差。然而,使用身高(2.7)计算LVM占预测值的百分比,似乎比使用去脂体重更能有效地识别与心血管疾病相关的偏离补偿值的情况。