缅因州-西雅图背部问卷:一份用于评估腰椎坐骨神经痛或椎管狭窄患者的12项残疾问卷:推导与验证队列分析结果

The Maine-Seattle back questionnaire: a 12-item disability questionnaire for evaluating patients with lumbar sciatica or stenosis: results of a derivation and validation cohort analysis.

作者信息

Atlas Steven J, Deyo Richard A, van den Ancker Melissa, Singer Daniel E, Keller Robert B, Patrick Donald L

机构信息

General Medicine Division and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 15;28(16):1869-76. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000083205.82614.01.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Analysis of health-related quality of life data obtained from a prospective cohort study of patients with sciatica due to an intervertebral disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE

To derive and validate a shortened version of a previously validated 23-item modification of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

For patients with low back pain, improving health-related quality of life is often the main goal of therapy. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is one of the best validated and most frequently used back-specific functional status measures. A shortened version may permit more widespread use in clinical and research settings.

METHODS

Data from 507 patients with sciatica enrolled in the Maine Lumbar Spine Study were used to derive a shortened version of a 23-item modification of the original Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire using qualitative and cluster analysis techniques. The internal consistency, construct validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness in detecting change over a 3-month period for a new 12-item scale was compared to the original 23-item scale. The 12-item scale was then validated in an independent cohort of 148 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was very good but modestly lower for the 12-item instrument compared to the 23-item original scale. Reproducibility over a 3-month interval was good and did not differ between the 12-item and original scale. Findings from the validation cohort were similar or better than the derivation cohort. A high degree of construct validity with patient-reported symptoms was demonstrated for the 12-item and original scales. The responsiveness and interpretability of the 12-item scale over 3 months was excellent and comparable to the original scale. Responsiveness assessed in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis in the independent validation cohort showed consistent findings compared to patients with a disc herniation in the derivation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This short, simple, self-administered 12-item back-specific functional status questionnaire performed extremely well in comparison with the original 23-item scale. If validated in additional study populations, this new questionnaire may be useful in the clinical setting as a way for providers to prospectively compare their outcomes of care to other patient populations, and to study treatment effectiveness.

摘要

研究设计

对因椎间盘突出或腰椎管狭窄导致坐骨神经痛的患者进行前瞻性队列研究所得的健康相关生活质量数据进行分析。

目的

推导并验证先前验证过的23项罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷修改版的简版。

背景数据总结

对于腰痛患者,改善健康相关生活质量通常是治疗的主要目标。罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷是经过最佳验证且最常用的针对背部的功能状态测量工具之一。简版可能会使其在临床和研究环境中得到更广泛的应用。

方法

使用缅因州腰椎研究中纳入的507例坐骨神经痛患者的数据,采用定性和聚类分析技术,推导原始罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷23项修改版的简版。将新的12项量表在3个月内检测变化的内部一致性、结构效度、可重复性和反应性与原始的23项量表进行比较。然后在148例腰椎管狭窄患者的独立队列中对12项量表进行验证。

结果

12项量表的内部一致性非常好,但与23项原始量表相比略低。3个月间隔的可重复性良好,12项量表与原始量表之间没有差异。验证队列的结果与推导队列相似或更好。12项量表和原始量表均显示出与患者报告症状的高度结构效度。12项量表在3个月内的反应性和可解释性极佳,与原始量表相当。在独立验证队列中对腰椎管狭窄患者评估的反应性与推导队列中椎间盘突出患者的结果一致。

结论

与原始的23项量表相比,这份简短、简单、可自行填写的12项针对背部的功能状态问卷表现极佳。如果在其他研究人群中得到验证,这份新问卷可能在临床环境中有用,可作为医疗服务提供者将其护理结果与其他患者群体进行前瞻性比较以及研究治疗效果的一种方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索