Suppr超能文献

青少年肌阵挛癫痫中不断发展的抗癫痫药物治疗

Evolving antiepileptic drug treatment in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

作者信息

Prasad Avinash, Kuzniecky Ruben I, Knowlton Robert C, Welty Tim E, Martin Roy C, Mendez M, Faught Raymond E

机构信息

Epilepsy Division, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, 312 Civitan International Research Center, 1719 Sixth Avenue, Birmingham, AL 35492, USA.

出版信息

Arch Neurol. 2003 Aug;60(8):1100-5. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1100.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the face of availability of newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as lamotrigine and topiramate, there is need to reassess the role of older AEDs in the treatment of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).

OBJECTIVES

To explore whether lamotrigine and topiramate monotherapy or polytherapy can be effective options in the treatment of JME, and to determine whether older AEDs, such as phenytoin and carbamazepine, have a role in the treatment of JME.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A large academic teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

Seventy-two consecutive JME patients treated with valproic acid, lamotrigine, topiramate, phenytoin, or carbamazepine between April 1, 1991, and March 31, 2001.

METHODS

We compared the efficacy of valproic acid, lamotrigine, and topiramate monotherapy or polytherapy in the control of different seizure types of JME, and compared their efficacy and tolerability with the efficacy and tolerability of phenytoin and carbamazepine.

RESULTS

Seizure outcome did not differ when patients receiving valproic acid monotherapy (n = 36) were compared with those receiving lamotrigine monotherapy (n = 14), and when patients receiving valproic acid polytherapy (n = 22) were compared with those receiving lamotrigine polytherapy (n = 21) or topiramate polytherapy (n = 15) (P>.05 for all). The combined data of myoclonic seizure control by all 3 AEDs were poorer when compared with the combined data of generalized tonic-clonic seizure control by all 3 AEDs (P =.03), but not when compared with the combined data of absence seizure control by all 3 AEDs (P =.43). Valproic acid, lamotrigine, and topiramate, when compared with phenytoin or carbamazepine, demonstrated significantly better control of myoclonic seizures (P<.01 for all), but not of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (P>.11 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Lamotrigine and topiramate are effective alternative options to valproic acid in the treatment of JME. Lamotrigine is an effective option as monotherapy and polytherapy. Topiramate is an effective option as polytherapy, but more data are needed to determine if it is an effective option as monotherapy. More effective therapy is needed to improve myoclonic seizure control. Older AEDs, such as phenytoin and carbamazepine, may not be indicated in JME patients.

摘要

背景

面对诸如拉莫三嗪和托吡酯等新型抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的出现,有必要重新评估 older AEDs 在青少年肌阵挛性癫痫(JME)治疗中的作用。

目的

探讨拉莫三嗪和托吡酯单药治疗或联合治疗是否为 JME 治疗的有效选择,并确定苯妥英和卡马西平等 older AEDs 在 JME 治疗中是否有作用。

设计

一项回顾性队列研究。

地点

一家大型学术教学医院。

患者

1991 年 4 月 1 日至 2001 年 3 月 31 日期间连续接受丙戊酸、拉莫三嗪、托吡酯、苯妥英或卡马西平治疗的 72 例 JME 患者。

方法

我们比较了丙戊酸、拉莫三嗪和托吡酯单药治疗或联合治疗在控制 JME 不同发作类型方面的疗效,并将它们的疗效和耐受性与苯妥英和卡马西平的疗效和耐受性进行比较。

结果

接受丙戊酸单药治疗的患者(n = 36)与接受拉莫三嗪单药治疗的患者(n = 14)相比,以及接受丙戊酸联合治疗的患者(n = 22)与接受拉莫三嗪联合治疗的患者(n = 21)或托吡酯联合治疗的患者(n = 15)相比,癫痫发作结果无差异(所有 P >.05)。与所有 3 种 AEDs 控制全身强直 - 阵挛性发作的综合数据相比,所有 3 种 AEDs 控制肌阵挛性发作的综合数据较差(P =.03),但与所有 3 种 AEDs 控制失神发作的综合数据相比则不然(P =.43)。与苯妥英或卡马西平相比,丙戊酸、拉莫三嗪和托吡酯在控制肌阵挛性发作方面表现出明显更好的效果(所有 P <.01),但在控制全身强直 - 阵挛性发作方面则不然(所有 P >.11)。

结论

在 JME 治疗中,拉莫三嗪和托吡酯是丙戊酸的有效替代选择。拉莫三嗪作为单药治疗和联合治疗都是有效的选择。托吡酯作为联合治疗是有效的选择,但需要更多数据来确定它作为单药治疗是否有效。需要更有效的治疗方法来改善肌阵挛性发作的控制。苯妥英和卡马西平等 older AEDs 可能不适用于 JME 患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验