Suppr超能文献

内镜下跟腱后间隙减压术

Endoscopic decompression of the retrocalcaneal space.

作者信息

Leitze Zachary, Sella Enzo J, Aversa John M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8071, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Aug;85(8):1488-96. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200308000-00009.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain in the retrocalcaneal space can be incapacitating. Patients who do not respond to nonoperative treatment may seek a surgical solution. The first purpose of this paper was to describe and evaluate the efficacy of a minimally invasive procedure to address retrocalcaneal pain caused by retrocalcaneal bursitis, a Haglund spur, and impingement. The second purpose was to compare the endoscopic technique with a standard open technique.

METHODS

Our prospective study included thirty-three heels in thirty consecutive patients with chronic pain in the retrocalcaneal space for which nonoperative treatment had failed and endoscopic decompression was performed. The mean age was forty-nine years (range, nineteen to seventy-nine years). This group was compared with a group of seventeen heels in fourteen patients with the same diagnostic criteria who were treated with an open technique. Both groups of patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, and the patients treated with the endoscopic procedure were also evaluated postoperatively with the University of Maryland 100-point Painful Foot Center Scoring System.

RESULTS

In the endoscopic group, the AOFAS scores averaged 61.8 points preoperatively and 87.5 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). The endoscopic procedures yielded nineteen excellent, five good, three fair, and three poor results at an average of twenty-two months postoperatively. (Three patients were excluded from the study.) In the open-treatment group, the AOFAS scores averaged 58.1 points preoperatively and 79.3 points at an average of forty-two months postoperatively (p = 0.006). The scores after the endoscopic procedures were numerically, but not significantly (p = 0.115), better than those after the open procedures. The time to recovery was the same in the two groups. The endoscopic procedures were performed more quickly than the open procedures (forty-four compared with fifty-six minutes) and were associated with fewer complications (a 3% compared with a 12% rate of infection, a 10% compared with an 18% rate of altered sensation, and a 7% compared with an 18% rate of scar tenderness).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic decompression is a feasible and efficient procedure for the treatment of retrocalcaneal disorders. It produces final results equal to or better than those of an open technique, with a similar recovery time, fewer complications, and a better cosmetic appearance.

摘要

背景

跟腱后间隙疼痛可能使人丧失活动能力。对非手术治疗无反应的患者可能会寻求手术解决方案。本文的首要目的是描述和评估一种微创手术治疗跟腱后滑囊炎、Haglund 骨赘和撞击所致跟腱后疼痛的疗效。第二个目的是将内镜技术与标准开放技术进行比较。

方法

我们的前瞻性研究纳入了连续 30 例跟腱后间隙慢性疼痛且非手术治疗失败并接受内镜减压的患者的 33 只足跟。平均年龄为 49 岁(范围 19 至 79 岁)。将该组与 14 例符合相同诊断标准并接受开放手术治疗的患者的 17 只足跟组成的组进行比较。两组患者术前和术后均采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)踝 - 后足评分量表进行评估,接受内镜手术的患者术后还采用马里兰大学 100 分疼痛足部中心评分系统进行评估。

结果

在内镜组中,AOFAS 评分术前平均为 61.8 分,术后为 87.5 分(p < 0.001)。内镜手术在术后平均 22 个月时产生 19 个优、5 个良、3 个可和 3 个差的结果。(3 例患者被排除在研究之外。)在开放治疗组中,AOFAS 评分术前平均为 58.1 分,术后平均 42 个月时为 79.3 分(p = 0.006)。内镜手术后的评分在数值上高于开放手术后的评分,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.115)。两组的恢复时间相同。内镜手术比开放手术进行得更快(分别为 44 分钟和 56 分钟),且并发症更少(感染率分别为 3%和 12%,感觉改变率分别为 10%和 18%,瘢痕压痛率分别为 7%和 18%)。

结论

内镜减压是治疗跟腱后疾病的一种可行且有效的方法。其最终结果等于或优于开放技术,恢复时间相似,并发症更少,外观更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验