• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

On the interaction between perceptual and response selection: neuropsychological evidence.

作者信息

Boutsen Luc, Humphreys Glyn W

机构信息

Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Neurocase. 2003 Jun;9(3):239-50. doi: 10.1076/neur.9.3.239.15556.

DOI:10.1076/neur.9.3.239.15556
PMID:12925930
Abstract

We examined the relations between selection for perception and selection for action in a patient FK, with bilateral damage to his temporal and medial frontal cortices. The task required a simple grasp response to a common object (a cup) in the presence of a distractor (another cup). The target was cued by colour or location, and FK made manual responses. We examined the effects on performance of cued and uncued dimensions of both the target and the distractor. FK was impaired at perceptually selecting the target when cued by colour, when the target colour but not its location changed on successive trials. The effect was sensitive to the relative orientations of targets and distractors, indicating an effect of action selection on perceptual selection, when perceptual selection was weakly instantiated. The dimension-specific carry-over effect on reaching was enhanced when there was a temporal delay between a cue and the response, and it disappeared when there was a between-trial delay. The results indicate that perceptual and action selection systems interact to determine the efficiency with which actions are selected to particular objects.

摘要

相似文献

1
On the interaction between perceptual and response selection: neuropsychological evidence.
Neurocase. 2003 Jun;9(3):239-50. doi: 10.1076/neur.9.3.239.15556.
2
Neural mechanisms of visual attention: object-based selection of a region in space.视觉注意的神经机制:基于对象的空间区域选择
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12 Suppl 2:106-17. doi: 10.1162/089892900563975.
3
Pre-saccadic perceptual facilitation can occur without covert orienting of attention.眼跳前知觉易化无需注意的内隐性定向。
Cortex. 2010 Oct;46(9):1132-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.014. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
4
Target-related distractors disrupt object selection in everyday action: evidence from participants with dementia.目标相关的干扰物会干扰日常行为中的物体选择:来自痴呆症患者的证据。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 May;16(3):484-94. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000081. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
5
Smooth pursuit eye movements and perception share target selection, but only some central resources.平稳跟踪眼球运动和感知共享目标选择,但仅共享一些中枢资源。
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jul 19;201(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.032. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
6
Goal-driven selective attention in patients with right hemisphere lesions: how intact is the ipsilesional field?右侧半球病变患者的目标驱动选择性注意:同侧视野的完整性如何?
Brain. 2006 Jan;129(Pt 1):168-81. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh690. Epub 2005 Nov 29.
7
Attentional inhibition in patients with focal frontal lobe lesions.局灶性额叶病变患者的注意力抑制
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005 May;27(4):485-503. doi: 10.1080/13803390490520454.
8
Does selecting one visual object from several require inhibition of the actions associated with nonselected objects?从多个视觉对象中选择一个是否需要抑制与未被选中对象相关的动作?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):670-91. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.670.
9
Neuropsychological evidence distinguishing object selection from action (effector) selection.神经心理学证据区分了物体选择和动作(效应器)选择。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2000 Sep 1;17(6):547-62. doi: 10.1080/02643290050110647.
10
Separating top-down and bottom-up cueing of attention from response inhibition in utilization behavior.在运用行为中,将自上而下和自下而上的注意力提示与反应抑制区分开来。
Neurocase. 2012;18(2):98-111. doi: 10.1080/13554794.2011.568496. Epub 2011 Oct 20.