Suppr超能文献

牛肉胴体背最长肌面积测量的准确性和重复性。

Accuracy and repeatability of beef carcass longissimus muscle area measurements.

作者信息

Steiner R, Vote D J, Belk K E, Scanga J A, Wise J W, Tatum J D, Smith G C

机构信息

Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523-1171, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 2003 Aug;81(8):1980-8. doi: 10.2527/2003.8181980x.

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the accuracy and repeatability of beef carcass longissimus muscle area (LMA) measurements obtained by three different methods. Longissimus muscle area for beef carcass sides (n = 100) randomly selected in a commercial packing plant was determined: 1) independently by three USDA grading supervisor "experts" using the grid method to obtain triplicate measurements of the same longissimus muscle (LM); 2) by three different Colorado State University personnel tracing the LMA on acetate paper and subsequently measuring the area via a polar planimeter three different times (total of 3 x 3 = 9 observations/LM); and 3) by use of two identical video image analysis (VIA) instruments making triplicate measurements for each LM using three different procedures. Video image analysis Procedure 1 required that LMA be measured by placing the camera head unit over the LM and collecting three sequential images without moving the camera head unit while carcasses were in a stationary position; Procedure 2 required measurement of LMA by placing the camera head unit over the LM and collecting three images, but removing and repositioning the camera head unit between collection of each image while carcasses were in a stationary position; and Procedure 3 required that LMA be measured by placing the camera head unit over the LM and obtaining an image while carcasses were in continuous motion (chain speed of 360 carcasses/ h) during three different circulations past the grading stand. Overall, VIA-derived LMA measurements were highly accurate for all three procedures compared with expert-gridded (R2 = 0.92, 0.90, and 0.84 for Procedures 1, 2, and 3, respectively) and acetate/planimeter-traced (R2 = 0.94, 0.93, and 0.86 for Procedures 1, 2, and 3, respectively) LMA measurements. Instrument LMA repeatability also was comparable to expert-gridded and acetate/planimeter-traced LMA repeatability, as the means of the absolute differences between individual measurements and the average of those same measurements per LM were 1.29, 1.35, 0.52, 0.84, and 1.87 cm2 for expert-gridded, acetate/planimeter-traced, and VIA Procedures 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Therefore, VIA instrumentation can be used to assess beef carcass LMA in both a stationary and operational scenario with high levels of accuracy and repeatability.

摘要

本研究旨在确定通过三种不同方法获得的牛肉胴体背最长肌面积(LMA)测量值的准确性和重复性。测定了在一家商业包装厂随机选取的100个牛肉胴体半边的背最长肌面积:1)由三名美国农业部分级主管“专家”独立使用网格法对同一背最长肌(LM)进行三次重复测量;2)由科罗拉多州立大学的三名不同人员在醋酸纸上描绘LMA,随后使用极坐标求积仪对面积进行三次不同测量(每个LM共3×3 = 9次观测);3)使用两台相同的视频图像分析(VIA)仪器,对每个LM使用三种不同程序进行三次重复测量。视频图像分析程序1要求将摄像头单元放置在LM上方,在胴体静止时不移动摄像头单元收集三张连续图像来测量LMA;程序2要求将摄像头单元放置在LM上方收集三张图像,但在每张图像收集之间移除并重新放置摄像头单元,胴体保持静止;程序3要求将摄像头单元放置在LM上方,在胴体以360胴体/小时的链速连续运动(经过分级台的三次不同循环)时获取一张图像来测量LMA。总体而言,与专家网格法(程序1、2和3的R2分别为0.92、0.90和0.84)和醋酸纸/求积仪描绘法(程序1、2和3的R2分别为0.94、0.93和0.86)相比,VIA得出的LMA测量值在所有三个程序中都具有很高的准确性。仪器LMA的重复性也与专家网格法和醋酸纸/求积仪描绘法的LMA重复性相当,因为对于专家网格法、醋酸纸/求积仪描绘法以及VIA程序1、2和3,单个测量值与每个LM相同测量值的平均值之间的绝对差的均值分别为1.29、1.35、0.52、0.84和1.87 cm2。因此,VIA仪器可用于在静止和操作场景中以高度的准确性和重复性评估牛肉胴体LMA。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验