Fukuda N, Shinohara H, Sakabe K, Onose Y, Nada T, Tamura Y
Department of Cardiology and Clinical Research, National Zentsuji Hospital, Zentsuji City, Kagawa, Japan.
Eur J Echocardiogr. 2003 Sep;4(3):191-5. doi: 10.1016/s1525-2167(02)00166-x.
We validated transthoracic echocardiographic measurements of left atrial appendage flow velocity by comparing them with transoesophageal echocardiographic measurements.
Eighty-four consecutive patients (mean age, 64.6 years) with various cardiac diseases, who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography were studied. Thirty-two patients were in sinus rhythm, and the remaining 52 patients were in atrial fibrillation. On transthoracic echocardiography, the transducer was placed somewhat superior and outside from the position viewing the conventional parasternal short-axis image of the aortic valve, so that the angle between left atrial appendage midline and Doppler beam could be narrowed. The left atrial appendage flow velocity pattern was recorded by pulsed Doppler mode with a sampling volume placed at the left atrial appendage orifice on both transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography. In both approaches, the peak emptying velocity (LAA-E) and the peak filling velocity (LAA-F) of the left atrial appendage were measured. In sinus rhythm, the LAA-E was detectable in 25 of the 32 patients (78.1%) and the LAA-F in 20 of the 32 patients (62.5%). Both LAA-E and LAA-F were detectable in 46 of the 52 patients (88.5%) in atrial fibrillation. Good correlations of LAA-E and LAA-F were observed between transthoracic echocardiography and transoesophageal echocardiography measurements in sinus rhythm (r=0.94, r=0.95, respectively; both, P<0.0001) and in atrial fibrillation (r=0.89, r=0.95, respectively; both, P<0.0001).
The left atrial appendage flow velocities could be sufficiently recorded and assessed by transthoracic echocardiography in 84 Japanese unselected consecutive patients with sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation.
通过将经胸超声心动图测量的左心耳血流速度与经食管超声心动图测量结果进行比较,对其进行验证。
对84例连续的患有各种心脏病且同时接受经胸超声心动图和经食管超声心动图检查的患者(平均年龄64.6岁)进行了研究。32例患者为窦性心律,其余52例患者为心房颤动。在经胸超声心动图检查中,将换能器放置在比观察主动脉瓣传统胸骨旁短轴图像的位置稍高且外侧的位置,以使左心耳中线与多普勒束之间的角度变窄。在经胸超声心动图和经食管超声心动图检查中,均采用脉冲多普勒模式,将取样容积置于左心耳开口处,记录左心耳血流速度模式。在两种检查方法中,均测量左心耳的峰值排空速度(LAA-E)和峰值充盈速度(LAA-F)。在窦性心律患者中,32例患者中有25例(78.1%)可检测到LAA-E,32例患者中有20例(62.5%)可检测到LAA-F。在心房颤动患者中,52例患者中有46例(88.5%)可同时检测到LAA-E和LAA-F。在窦性心律(r分别为0.94和0.95;均P<0.0001)和心房颤动(r分别为0.89和0.95;均P<0.0001)中,经胸超声心动图和经食管超声心动图测量的LAA-E和LAA-F之间均存在良好的相关性。
在84例未经选择的连续日本窦性心律或心房颤动患者中,经胸超声心动图能够充分记录和评估左心耳血流速度。