Suppr超能文献

ERCP中用于胆管插管的标准导管与可操纵导管的比较。

Comparison of standard and steerable catheters for bile duct cannulation in ERCP.

作者信息

Laasch H-U, Tringali A, Wilbraham L, Marriott A, England R E, Mutignani M, Perri V, Costamagna G, Martin D F

机构信息

Academic Dept. of GI-Radiology, South Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester and University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2003 Aug;35(8):669-74. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41515.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

The aim of the study was to compare two steerable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) catheters with regard to speed and safety in cannulating the common bile duct.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A standard cannula, a short-nosed sphincterotome, and a bendable catheter were used. At two tertiary centres, a total of 312 patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with one of three catheters and either by a trainee or an expert endoscopist. When cannulation failed, a further attempt was made with a different catheter. If this failed, a change in operator or other manoeuvres followed. The following were assessed: time to cholangiography and deep cannulation, number of attempts and success rates of cannulation, number of pancreatic duct injections, success of catheter cross-over, and complication rates.

RESULTS

Both steerable catheters were significantly better for the initial cholangiogram than the standard catheter (standard catheter 75 %, bendable catheter 84 %, sphincterotome 88 %; P = 0.038), with no significant differences between the bendable catheter and the sphincterotome. Both were also better for deep cannulation of the bile duct (standard cannula 66 %, bendable catheter 69 %, sphincterotome 78 %; P = 0.15). When the standard catheter failed, a steerable catheter succeeded in 26 % of cases. Trainees experienced greater benefit from using steerable catheters. For experts, the bendable catheter was the quickest to achieve cholangiography and deep cannulation. Further manoeuvres had an 85-90 % success rate in allowing biliary access. Twenty of 23 needle-knife papillotomies (87 %) were successful when other methods had failed. The overall ERCP success rate was 97 %. Pancreatitis occurred in 5.3 % of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Steerable catheters allow faster access and can succeed when a standard catheter fails. If cannulation is difficult, changing the catheter should be considered at an early stage. Needle-knife papillotomy is a successful technique in expert hands.

摘要

背景与研究目的

本研究旨在比较两种可操控性内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)导管在胆管插管的速度和安全性方面的差异。

患者与方法

使用标准插管、短鼻括约肌切开刀和可弯曲导管。在两个三级医疗中心,共312例患者被随机分配接受三种导管之一的治疗,治疗者为实习医生或专家内镜医师。当插管失败时,换用不同的导管再次尝试。若再次失败,则更换操作者或采取其他操作。评估以下指标:胆管造影和深部插管时间、尝试次数和插管成功率、胰管注射次数、导管交叉成功率以及并发症发生率。

结果

两种可操控性导管在初始胆管造影方面均显著优于标准导管(标准导管75%,可弯曲导管84%,括约肌切开刀88%;P = 0.038),可弯曲导管与括约肌切开刀之间无显著差异。两者在胆管深部插管方面也更具优势(标准插管66%,可弯曲导管69%,括约肌切开刀78%;P = 0.15)。当标准导管插管失败时,可操控性导管在26%的病例中成功。实习医生使用可操控性导管获益更大。对于专家而言,可弯曲导管实现胆管造影和深部插管最快。进一步操作在实现胆管通路方面成功率为85% - 90%。当其他方法失败时,23例针刀乳头切开术中有20例(87%)成功。ERCP总体成功率为97%。5.3%的病例发生胰腺炎。

结论

可操控性导管能更快实现胆管通路,且在标准导管失败时可能成功。若插管困难,应尽早考虑更换导管。针刀乳头切开术在专家手中是一项成功的技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验