Ooie Tatsuhiko, Tsuchiya Takeshi, Ashikaga Keiichi, Honda Toshihiro, Takahashi Naohiko
Cardiovascular Center, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Jul;14(7):722-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.02345.x.
The aim of this study was to examine the location of anterograde and retrograde slow pathways in 16 patients with uncommon atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), including the fast-slow form in 10, slow-slow form in 5, and both fast-slow and slow-slow forms in 1.
Patients were divided into two groups according to the approach used for slow pathway ablation in the initial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA): one approach used earliest atrial activation during tachycardia (ES group, n = 9), and the other used a slow potential during sinus rhythm (SP group, n = 7). When the initial RFCA failed to eliminate slow pathway conduction in the ES group, an additional RFCA guided by a slow potential was performed. The ratio of lengths from the His-bundle region to the RFCA site and coronary sinus ostium (Abl/His-CS ratio) and the ratio of amplitudes of atrial and ventricular potentials at the RFCA site (A/V ratio) were compared between the two groups. In the initial RFCA, retrograde slow pathway conduction was eliminated without impairment of anterograde slow pathway conduction in 8 (89%) patients from the ES group, and bidirectional slow pathway conduction was eliminated in 6 (86%) patients from the SP group. Residual anterograde slow pathway conduction that was preserved after the initial RFCA in 8 of 9 patients was eliminated by an additional slow potential-guided RFCA. Both the Abl/His-CS ratio (0.86 +/- 0.07 vs 0.73 +/- 0.11, P = 0.01) and A/V ratio (0.80 +/- 0.31 vs. 0.14 +/- 0.01, P < 0.001) were higher in the ES group than the SP group. The ratios for the residual anterograde slow pathway ablation in the ES group were similar to those in the SP group.
The results of this study suggest that the retrograde slow pathway runs more on the atrial side of the tricuspid valve annulus at the level of the coronary sinus ostium compared with the anterograde slow pathway, although both pathways run parallel or are fused in portions more proximal to the His bundle.
本研究旨在检查16例不常见房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者顺行和逆行慢径的位置,其中10例为快慢型,5例为慢慢型,1例同时存在快慢型和慢慢型。
根据初次射频导管消融(RFCA)中慢径消融所采用的方法,将患者分为两组:一组采用心动过速时最早心房激动(ES组,n = 9),另一组采用窦性心律时的慢电位(SP组,n = 7)。当ES组初次RFCA未能消除慢径传导时,进行了慢电位引导下的额外RFCA。比较两组从希氏束区域到RFCA部位与冠状窦口的长度比(Abl/His-CS比)以及RFCA部位心房和心室电位的幅度比(A/V比)。在初次RFCA中,ES组8例(89%)患者的逆行慢径传导被消除,而顺行慢径传导未受损害,SP组6例(86%)患者的双向慢径传导被消除。9例患者中有8例在初次RFCA后保留的残余顺行慢径传导通过额外的慢电位引导RFCA被消除。ES组的Abl/His-CS比(0.86±0.07对0.73±0.11,P = 0.01)和A/V比(0.80±0.31对0.14±0.01,P < 0.001)均高于SP组。ES组残余顺行慢径消融的比值与SP组相似。
本研究结果表明,与顺行慢径相比,逆行慢径在冠状窦口水平的三尖瓣环心房侧走行更多,尽管两条路径在更靠近希氏束的部分平行或融合。