Bradford James R, Westhead David R
School of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Protein Sci. 2003 Sep;12(9):2099-103. doi: 10.1110/ps.0306303.
We have carried out a thorough and systematic sequence-structure study on how the pattern of conservation at the interface differs from the noninteracting surface in seven proteases and their inhibitors. As expected, the interface of a protease could be easily distinguished from the noninteracting surface by a concentrated area of conservation. In contrast, there was less distinction to be made between the interface and the noninteracting surface of inhibitors, and in five of the seven cases, a higher proportion of the interface area was variable compared to the rest of the surface. This is likely to cause a problem for binding-site prediction methods that assume the largest cluster of highly conserved residues on the surface of a protein corresponds to the interface. We conclude that such methods would succeed when applied to our protease test cases, but complications could arise with the inhibitors. These results also impact on methods to solve the protein-protein docking problem that use conservation at the interface to provide the location of the two protein binding sites prior to application of the docking algorithm.
我们针对七种蛋白酶及其抑制剂,就界面处的保守模式与非相互作用表面的差异展开了全面且系统的序列-结构研究。不出所料,蛋白酶的界面可通过一个保守集中区域轻松与非相互作用表面区分开来。相比之下,抑制剂的界面与非相互作用表面之间的差异较小,在七个案例中的五个里,与表面其他部分相比,界面区域有更高比例是可变的。这可能会给结合位点预测方法带来问题,这些方法假定蛋白质表面高度保守残基的最大簇对应于界面。我们得出结论,此类方法应用于我们的蛋白酶测试案例时会成功,但应用于抑制剂时可能会出现复杂情况。这些结果也对解决蛋白质-蛋白质对接问题的方法产生影响,这些方法在应用对接算法之前,利用界面处的保守性来确定两个蛋白质结合位点的位置。