Herborn Christoph U, Goyen Mathias, Lauenstein Thomas C, Debatin Jörg F, Ruehm Stefan G, Kröger Knut
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45122, Germany.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Sep;181(3):729-35. doi: 10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810729.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of MRI and MR angiography for the assessment of peripheral vascular malformations compared with the usefulness of conventional duplex sonography, venography, and arteriography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Nineteen patients (age range, 8-64 years; 11 males and eight females) with clinically diagnosed or suspected angiodyplastic abnormalities of the extremities were examined on a 1.5-T whole-body MR scanner. Using parameters based on a fast localizer sequence, we acquired transverse or coronal T1-, T2-, short tau inversion recovery (STIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Dynamic contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) gradient-echo MRIs were acquired to determine the extent and type of the arteriovenous malformation for each patient. MR data sets were evaluated for lesion depiction, determination of the extent of the malformation, involvement of neighboring structures, vascular detail, and treatment planning. Results were compared with findings from duplex sonography, venography, and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.
All MRIs were of diagnostic quality and revealed 12 venous vascular malformations, four arteriovenous malformations, and three hemangiomas. The STIR sequence was helpful for determining the extent of the vascular malformation, which was often underestimated using contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography alone, whereas dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography was required for classifying the type of the lesion. MR angiography was inferior to conventional angiography for revealing vascular detail and for planning intervention.
MRI and MR angiography appear to be valuable for the assessment of vascular malformations of the extremities. The protocol for imaging such malformations should combine dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MRI with STIR sequences. However, digital subtraction angiography and venography are still required for definitive treatment decisions.
本研究旨在评估磁共振成像(MRI)和磁共振血管造影(MRA)在评估周围血管畸形方面的效用,并与传统双功超声、静脉造影和动脉造影的效用进行比较。
19例临床诊断或疑似肢体血管发育异常的患者(年龄范围8 - 64岁;男性11例,女性8例)在1.5T全身MR扫描仪上接受检查。基于快速定位序列设置参数,采集横断位或冠状位T1加权、T2加权、短反转时间反转恢复(STIR)序列以及对比增强T1加权图像。采集动态对比增强三维(3D)梯度回波MRI,以确定每位患者动静脉畸形的范围和类型。对MR数据集进行评估,以观察病变显示情况、畸形范围的确定、邻近结构的累及情况、血管细节以及治疗规划。将结果与双功超声、静脉造影和动脉内数字减影血管造影的结果进行比较。
所有MRI图像均具有诊断质量,显示12例静脉血管畸形、4例动静脉畸形和3例血管瘤。STIR序列有助于确定血管畸形的范围,仅使用对比增强3D MRA时,血管畸形范围常被低估,而病变类型的分类需要动态对比增强3D MRA。在显示血管细节和规划干预方面,MRA不如传统血管造影。
MRI和MRA在评估肢体血管畸形方面似乎具有重要价值。针对此类畸形的成像方案应将动态对比增强3D梯度回波MRI与STIR序列相结合。然而,最终治疗决策仍需要数字减影血管造影和静脉造影。