Suppr超能文献

评估茚地那韦/利托那韦与沙奎那韦/利托那韦治疗1型人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者的随机试验:MaxCmin1试验

Randomized trial to evaluate indinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: the MaxCmin1 Trial.

作者信息

Dragsted Ulrik Bak, Gerstoft Jan, Pedersen Court, Peters Barry, Duran Adriana, Obel Niels, Castagna Antonella, Cahn Pedro, Clumeck Nathan, Bruun Johan N, Benetucci Jorge, Hill Andrew, Cassetti Isabel, Vernazza Pietro, Youle Mike, Fox Zoe, Lundgren Jens D

机构信息

Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

J Infect Dis. 2003 Sep 1;188(5):635-42. doi: 10.1086/377288. Epub 2003 Aug 20.

Abstract

This trial assessed the rate of virological failure at 48 weeks in adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected patients assigned indinavir/ritonavir (Idv/Rtv; 800/100 mg 2 times daily) or saquinavir/ritonavir (Sqv/Rtv; 1000/100 mg 2 times daily) in an open-label, randomized (1:1), multicenter, phase 4 design. Three hundred six patients began the assigned treatment. At 48 weeks, virological failure was seen in 43 (27%) of 158 and 37 (25%) of 148 patients in the Idv/Rtv and Sqv/Rtv arms, respectively. The time to virological failure did not differ between study arms (P=.76). When switching from randomized treatment was counted as failure, this was seen in 78 of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 51 of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.009). A switch from the randomized treatment occurred in 64 (41%) of 158 patients in the Idv/Rtv arm, versus 40 (27%) of 148 patients in the Sqv/Rtv arm (P=.013). Sixty-four percent of the switches occurred because of adverse events. A greater number of treatment-limiting adverse events were observed in the Idv/Rtv arm, relative to the Sqv/Rtv arm. In conclusion, Rtv-boosed Sqv and Idv were found to have comparable antiretroviral effects in the doses studied.

摘要

本试验采用开放标签、随机(1:1)、多中心、4期设计,评估了成人1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染患者接受茚地那韦/利托那韦(Idv/Rtv;800/100毫克,每日2次)或沙奎那韦/利托那韦(Sqv/Rtv;1000/100毫克,每日2次)治疗48周时的病毒学失败率。306例患者开始接受指定治疗。在48周时,Idv/Rtv组158例患者中有43例(27%)出现病毒学失败,Sqv/Rtv组148例患者中有37例(25%)出现病毒学失败。各研究组之间病毒学失败时间无差异(P = 0.76)。若将从随机治疗转换视为失败,则Idv/Rtv组158例患者中有78例出现这种情况,而Sqv/Rtv组148例患者中有51例出现这种情况(P = 0.009)。Idv/Rtv组158例患者中有64例(41%)从随机治疗中转换,而Sqv/Rtv组148例患者中有40例(27%)出现转换(P = 0.013)。64%的转换是由于不良事件。相对于Sqv/Rtv组,Idv/Rtv组观察到更多的治疗限制性不良事件。总之,在研究的剂量下,利托那韦增强的沙奎那韦和茚地那韦具有相当的抗逆转录病毒作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验