Winston Alan, Mallon Patrick W G, Satchell Claudette, MacRae Karen, Williams Kenneth M, Schutz Malte, Law Matthew, Cooper David A, Emery Sean
National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Jun 1;44(11):1475-83. doi: 10.1086/517507. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
Toxicities observed with current combination antiretroviral therapy (CART) warrant a search for novel options, such as class-sparing regimens. Ritonavir-boosted double-protease inhibitor (PI)-only regimens are such an option but are prone to pharmacokinetic interactions.
This 48-week randomized study examined the safety and efficacy of a switch in CART to a once-daily regimen of saquinavir (SQV), ritonavir (RTV), and atazanavir (ATV) that did not include nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The study also assessed the pharmacokinetic profile of a change in the SQV formulation, from 200 mg to 500 mg, in 2 regimens (SQV-RTV twice per day plus NRTIs [arm 1] and SQV-RTV-ATV once per day without NRTIs [arm 2]) in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects (plasma human immunodeficiency virus RNA level, <50 copies/mL). Patients underwent an initial SQV formulation change or a CART change to SQV-RTV-ATV with intense pharmacokinetic sampling. All patients were subsequently assigned to receive SQV-RTV-ATV (1500, 100, and 300 mg once per day, respectively) without NRTIs for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the percentage of patients who experienced virologic failure.
Of 25 subjects enrolled, scleral icterus was the most common adverse event (3 patients [12.5%]). Three subjects (12.5%) experienced virologic failure; and mean (+/- standard error of the mean) increase in the CD4(+) lymphocyte count was 63 +/- 36 cells/ mu L over 48 weeks (P=.012). The SQV geometric mean area under the time curve parameters were not significantly altered for the 2 SQV formulations (arm 1, 23.32 vs. 18.76 ngxh/mL [geometric mean ratio, 0.80] for the 200-mg vs. 500-mg formulations, respectively; arm 2, 50.31 vs. 44.79 ngxh/mL [geometric mean ratio, 0.88], for the 200-mg vs. 500-mg formulations, respectively).
A CART regimen of SQV-RTV-ATV alone demonstrated sustained virologic efficacy and was associated with significant increases in the CD4(+) lymphocyte count.
目前的联合抗逆转录病毒疗法(CART)所观察到的毒性促使人们寻找新的治疗方案,例如不使用某类药物的治疗方案。利托那韦增强的仅含双蛋白酶抑制剂(PI)的治疗方案就是这样一种选择,但容易出现药代动力学相互作用。
这项为期48周的随机研究考察了将CART转换为每日一次的沙奎那韦(SQV)、利托那韦(RTV)和阿扎那韦(ATV)治疗方案(不包括核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂[NRTIs])的安全性和有效性。该研究还评估了在两种治疗方案(每日两次SQV-RTV加NRTIs [第1组]和每日一次不使用NRTIs的SQV-RTV-ATV [第2组])中,将SQV制剂从200毫克改为500毫克对人类免疫缺陷病毒1型感染受试者(血浆人类免疫缺陷病毒RNA水平,<50拷贝/毫升)药代动力学特征的影响。患者进行了初始的SQV制剂更换或CART转换为SQV-RTV-ATV,并进行了密集的药代动力学采样。所有患者随后被分配接受不使用NRTIs的SQV-RTV-ATV(分别为每日一次1500、100和300毫克),持续48周。主要终点是出现病毒学失败的患者百分比。
在纳入的25名受试者中,巩膜黄疸是最常见的不良事件(3例患者[12.5%])。3名受试者(12.5%)出现病毒学失败;在48周内,CD4(+)淋巴细胞计数的平均(±平均标准误差)增加为63±36个细胞/微升(P = 0.012)。对于两种SQV制剂,SQV时间曲线下面积的几何平均值参数没有显著改变(第1组,200毫克制剂与500毫克制剂分别为23.32与18.76纳克·时/毫升[几何平均比值,0.80];第2组,200毫克制剂与500毫克制剂分别为50.31与44.79纳克·时/毫升[几何平均比值,0.88])。
单独使用SQV-RTV-ATV的CART治疗方案显示出持续的病毒学疗效,并与CD4(+)淋巴细胞计数的显著增加相关。