Shultz Sandra J., Perrin David H., Adams Milton J., Arnold Brent L., Gansneder Bruce M., Granata Kevin P.
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
J Athl Train. 2001 Mar;36(1):37-43.
We examined whether muscle response times and activation patterns in the lower extremity differed between men and women in response to a rotational knee perturbation while standing in a single-leg, weight-bearing stance. DESIGN AND SETTING: We used a lower extremity perturbation device to produce a sudden, forward, and either internal or external rotation moment of the trunk and femur relative to the weight-bearing tibia. Subjects completed 10 trials of both internal and external rotation perturbation; the first 5 acceptable trials were averaged and used for data analysis. Two separate, repeated-measures analyses of variance were used to compare myoelectric response times and activation patterns between men and women for both internal and external rotation perturbation. SUBJECTS: Thirty-two female (19 lacrosse, 13 soccer) and 32 male (lacrosse) healthy intercollegiate athletes participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS: We used surface electromyography to record long latency reflex times of the medial and lateral quadriceps, hamstring, and gastrocnemius muscles. RESULTS: Women responded faster than men, primarily due to a shorter latency in quadriceps activation. However, men and women exhibited no difference in muscle-recruitment order. CONCLUSIONS: Although men and women demonstrated similar muscle-recruitment patterns to an imposed lower extremity perturbation, women tended to activate their quadriceps earlier than men. Whether this earlier quadriceps activation diminishes the ability of the hamstrings to adequately stabilize the knee joint or subjects the anterior cruciate ligament to greater risk of injury is still unknown and requires further study. Furthermore, although surface electromyography and measurement of myoelectric response times are useful in evaluating the timing, activation order, and coactivity patterns of the knee musculature, future studies should evaluate sex differences across the complete response continuum, including measures of intrinsic muscle stiffness, electromechanical delay, and time to force production.
我们研究了单腿负重站立时,在膝关节受到旋转扰动的情况下,男性和女性下肢的肌肉反应时间和激活模式是否存在差异。
我们使用一种下肢扰动装置,相对于负重的胫骨产生躯干和股骨突然向前的内旋或外旋力矩。受试者完成了10次内旋和外旋扰动试验;前5次可接受的试验数据进行平均并用于数据分析。使用两个独立的重复测量方差分析来比较男性和女性在内旋和外旋扰动时的肌电反应时间和激活模式。
32名女性(19名长曲棍球运动员,13名足球运动员)和32名男性(长曲棍球运动员)健康的大学间运动员参与了这项研究。
我们使用表面肌电图记录股内侧肌、股外侧肌、腘绳肌和腓肠肌的长潜伏期反射时间。
女性的反应比男性快,主要是由于股四头肌激活的潜伏期较短。然而,男性和女性在肌肉募集顺序上没有差异。
尽管男性和女性在下肢受到扰动时表现出相似的肌肉募集模式,但女性股四头肌的激活往往比男性更早。这种股四头肌的早期激活是否会降低腘绳肌充分稳定膝关节的能力,或者使前交叉韧带面临更大的受伤风险,目前尚不清楚,需要进一步研究。此外,尽管表面肌电图和肌电反应时间的测量有助于评估膝关节肌肉组织的时间、激活顺序和共同激活模式,但未来的研究应评估整个反应连续体中的性别差异,包括固有肌肉僵硬度、机电延迟和力量产生时间等指标。