Borsa Paul A, Sauers Eric L, Herling Derald E
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
J Athl Train. 2002 Sep;37(3):240-245.
To quantify and compare the glenohumeral stiffness response in anterior-directed, posterior-directed, and inferior-directed translations in healthy men and women. DESIGN AND SETTING: We used a 2 division on times 3 factorial design and employed a device capable of measuring glenohumeral joint displacement as a function of force to gather kinematic data during a single test session. SUBJECTS: Twenty subjects with healthy nondominant shoulders participated in the study. MEASUREMENTS: Force-displacement measures were taken in the anterior, posterior, and inferior translational directions of the glenohumeral joint. These measurements simulated common laxity tests used at the shoulder. RESULTS: Analysis of variance revealed a nonsignificant sex division on times direction interaction effect (P >.05). The main effect for sex and direction was also not significant (P >.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that (1) glenohumeral stiffness is widely distributed in healthy shoulders, (2) glenohumeral stiffness is not significantly different between men and women, and (3) glenohumeral stiffness is not significantly different among directions of translations.
量化并比较健康男性和女性在肩关节前向、后向和下向平移时的盂肱关节僵硬反应。
我们采用2×3析因设计,并使用一种能够测量盂肱关节位移随力变化的装置来在单次测试过程中收集运动学数据。
20名非优势肩健康的受试者参与了本研究。
在盂肱关节的前向、后向和下向平移方向上进行力-位移测量。这些测量模拟了肩部常用的松弛度测试。
方差分析显示性别×方向交互效应无显著差异(P>.05)。性别和方向的主效应也不显著(P>.05)。
我们的结果表明:(1)盂肱关节僵硬在健康肩部广泛分布;(2)男性和女性之间的盂肱关节僵硬无显著差异;(3)不同平移方向之间的盂肱关节僵硬无显著差异。