Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine and joint affiliated with Research Center for Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Advanced Medical Technologies and Equipment Institute (AMTEI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine and joint affiliated with Research Center for Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Advanced Medical Technologies and Equipment Institute (AMTEI), Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.
J Biomech. 2021 Oct 11;127:110663. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110663. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
Clinical assessment of capsuloligamentous structures of the glenohumeral joint has been qualitative and subjective in nature, as demonstrated by limited intra- and inter-rater reliability. Robotic devices were utilized to develop a clinically objective measurement technique for glenohumeral joint stiffness. The purpose of this study was to quantify the amount of inferior-direction stiffness of the glenohumeral joint using a safe clinical device in the asymptomatic individuals, and to determine between trial and between session reliability of the robotic device. Twenty healthy subjects were recruited via convenience sampling. Inferior-directed translation and applying force were measured using displacement and force sensors of a robotic device. The stiffness values were calculated as the mean of the slopes of the linear portions of the force-displacement curves for the cycles obtained after familiarization and preconditioning. Four trials for each measurement occasion were averaged to determine the stiffness value for each subject in one session. Repeatability of glenohumeral joint stiffness measurements for between trials and between two sessions was determined using intraclass correlation values and standard error of the measurements. The mean stiffness value was 1.50 N/mm (±0.40) and 1.52 N/mm (±0.40), respectively. The robotic device for stiffness assessment was reliable for repeated measures of stiffness in one session, and between sessions with ICC equal 0.96 (95% CI 0.93-0.98), and 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99), respectively. The SEM between the trials was in each session 0.08 N/mm. The results of this study provide that our robotic technique for quantifying glenohumeral joint stiffness is precise and reproducible.
对肩盂关节囊和韧带结构的临床评估本质上是定性和主观的,其可靠性受到限制。机器人设备被用于开发一种用于评估肩关节僵硬的临床客观测量技术。本研究的目的是使用安全的临床设备在无症状个体中量化肩关节的下向僵硬程度,并确定机器人设备的试验内和试验间可靠性。通过方便抽样招募了 20 名健康受试者。使用机器人设备的位移和力传感器测量下向平移和施加的力。通过对熟悉和预适应后获得的循环的力-位移曲线的线性部分进行平均,计算出刚度值。每个测量时刻的四个试验的平均值用于确定每个受试者在一个试验中的刚度值。通过组内相关系数值和测量的标准误差来确定试验间和两次试验间的肩关节刚度测量的重复性。平均刚度值分别为 1.50 N/mm(±0.40)和 1.52 N/mm(±0.40)。用于评估刚度的机器人设备在一次试验中进行刚度重复测量,以及在两次试验间测量时具有可靠性,组内相关系数分别为 0.96(95%置信区间 0.93-0.98)和 0.97(95%置信区间 0.95-0.99)。每个试验间的 SEM 为 0.08 N/mm。本研究的结果表明,我们用于量化肩关节刚度的机器人技术精确且可重复。