Lorenzo Gómez M F, Schroeder G
Department of Urology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
Actas Urol Esp. 2003 Jul-Aug;27(7):501-12. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(03)72963-5.
Review the literature on tumor markers used for prognosis of transitional bladder cancer. The existing problems regarding grading and local staging of these tumors are also discussed.
The published literature on transitional bladder cancer markers was identified using a Medline search and critically analysed.
There are significant interobserver differences in grading. There is a new grading system. There are also problems in local staging and low correlation between clinic stage and pathologic stage. Major tumor markers studied for prognosis of transitional bladder cancer are: flow cytometry, kariocytometric study, oncogenes (p53, bcl-2, Her2/Neu or c-erbB2), chromosomic alterations (chromosomes 9, 7 and 17), proliferation markers (Ki-67, MIB-1), cyclin-dependent kinases and its inhibitors (cyclin D1, cyclin E, p21Wafl, p27Kipl), vascular endothelial growth factor, other growth factors (fibroblastic, epidermal, hepatocyte, platelet-derived), metalloproteinases, cell adhesion molecules, and others.
At present, there are no prognostic markers for bladder cancer that are superior to conventional grading and staging, despite its imperfections. Standarization of assay methods in bladder tumor markers is needed to permit more conclusive and reproducible results and become a clinic tool. Controversy resulting from several studies make the meaning of some putative prognostic markers in transitional bladder cancer questionable.
回顾有关用于移行性膀胱癌预后评估的肿瘤标志物的文献。同时讨论这些肿瘤在分级和局部分期方面存在的现有问题。
通过医学文献数据库检索确定已发表的关于移行性膀胱癌标志物的文献,并进行严格分析。
在分级方面观察者之间存在显著差异。存在一种新的分级系统。在局部分期方面也存在问题,临床分期与病理分期之间的相关性较低。用于移行性膀胱癌预后评估的主要肿瘤标志物有:流式细胞术、细胞核测量研究、癌基因(p53、bcl-2、Her2/Neu或c-erbB2)、染色体改变(9号、7号和17号染色体)、增殖标志物(Ki-67、MIB-1)、细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶及其抑制剂(细胞周期蛋白D1、细胞周期蛋白E、p21Wafl、p27Kipl)、血管内皮生长因子、其他生长因子(成纤维细胞生长因子、表皮生长因子、肝细胞生长因子、血小板衍生生长因子)、金属蛋白酶、细胞黏附分子等。
目前,尽管传统的分级和分期存在缺陷,但尚无优于它们的膀胱癌预后标志物。需要对膀胱肿瘤标志物的检测方法进行标准化,以获得更具决定性和可重复性的结果,并成为一种临床工具。多项研究引发的争议使得一些假定的移行性膀胱癌预后标志物的意义存疑。