Tcheng James E, Kandzari David E, Grines Cindy L, Cox David A, Effron Mark B, Garcia Eulogio, Griffin John J, Guagliumi Giulio, Stuckey Thomas, Turco Mark, Fahy Martin, Lansky Alexandra J, Mehran Roxana, Stone Gregg W
Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Circulation. 2003 Sep 16;108(11):1316-23. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087601.45803.86. Epub 2003 Aug 25.
Trials of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors as adjuncts to primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction (MI) have shown improved early clinical and angiographic outcomes with treatment. However, variations in trial designs, modest sample sizes, and limited long-term follow-up have precluded these studies from being definitive.
As a prespecified secondary analysis of the CADILLAC trial, we compared early and late outcomes by abciximab assignment among 2082 patients randomized in an open-label, 2x2 factorial-design trial of primary stenting versus angioplasty and abciximab treatment (n=1052) versus no abciximab treatment (n=1030). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Abciximab treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the composite end point of death, MI, ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR), or disabling stroke at 30 days (4.6% versus 7.0%; relative risk, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.93; P=0.01). Subacute thrombosis also was significantly reduced with abciximab treatment. At 12 months, however, rates of the composite end point did not differ significantly (18.4% for controls versus 16.9% for abciximab-treated patients; relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.10; P=0.29), reflecting a decrease in the relative difference in TVR rates (ie, no effect of abciximab on reducing restenosis). In an angiographic substudy (n=656), myocardial salvage, restenosis, and infarct-artery reocclusion at 7 months were unaffected by abciximab treatment. There was no significant interaction between stenting and abciximab treatment.
Adjunctive abciximab treatment during primary percutaneous coronary intervention significantly enhanced 30-day event-free survival, predominantly by reducing ischemia-driven TVR. Abciximab treatment did not affect the composite end point at 1 year, reflecting a lack of effect on restenosis.
血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂作为急性心肌梗死(MI)直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗辅助药物的试验表明,治疗可改善早期临床和血管造影结果。然而,试验设计的差异、样本量适中以及长期随访有限,使得这些研究无法得出明确结论。
作为CADILLAC试验的一项预先设定的二级分析,我们在一项开放标签、2×2析因设计试验中,比较了2082例随机分组患者中使用阿昔单抗与未使用阿昔单抗的早期和晚期结果。该试验比较了直接支架置入术与血管成形术,以及阿昔单抗治疗组(n = 1052)与未使用阿昔单抗治疗组(n = 1030)。两组基线特征均衡。阿昔单抗治疗与30天时死亡、心肌梗死、缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建(TVR)或致残性卒中的复合终点显著降低相关(4.6%对7.0%;相对危险度,0.65;95%可信区间,0.46至0.93;P = 0.01)。阿昔单抗治疗也显著降低了亚急性血栓形成。然而,在12个月时,复合终点发生率无显著差异(对照组为18.4%,阿昔单抗治疗患者为16.9%;相对危险度,0.92;95%可信区间,0.76至1.10;P = 0.29),这反映了TVR率相对差异的减小(即阿昔单抗对减少再狭窄无作用)。在一项血管造影亚研究(n = 656)中,7个月时心肌挽救、再狭窄和梗死动脉再闭塞不受阿昔单抗治疗影响。支架置入术与阿昔单抗治疗之间无显著交互作用。
直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间辅助使用阿昔单抗治疗可显著提高30天无事件生存率,主要是通过减少缺血驱动的TVR。阿昔单抗治疗对1年时的复合终点无影响,这反映了对再狭窄无作用。