Suppr超能文献

老年急性心肌梗死患者接受直接冠状动脉介入治疗的结果:来自抑制晚期血管成形术并发症的阿昔单抗与器械对照研究(CADILLAC)试验的结果

Outcome in elderly patients undergoing primary coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial.

作者信息

Guagliumi Giulio, Stone Gregg W, Cox David A, Stuckey Thomas, Tcheng James E, Turco Mark, Musumeci Giuseppe, Griffin John J, Lansky Alexandra J, Mehran Roxana, Grines Cindy L, Garcia Eulogio

机构信息

Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Circulation. 2004 Sep 21;110(12):1598-604. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000142862.98817.1F. Epub 2004 Sep 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biological age is a strong determinant of prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We sought to examine the impact of age after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in AMI and to determine whether routine coronary stent implantation and/or platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors improve clinical outcomes in elderly patients after primary angioplasty.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the CADILLAC trial, 2082 patients with AMI were randomized to balloon angioplasty, angioplasty plus abciximab, stenting alone, or stenting plus abciximab. No patient was excluded on the basis of advanced age; patients ranging from 21 to 95 years of age were enrolled. One-year mortality increased for each decile of age, exponentially after 65 years of age (1.6% for patients <55 years, 2.1% for 55 to 65 years, 7.1% for 65 to 75 years, 11.1% for patients >75 years; P<0.0001). Elderly patients also had increased rates of stroke and major bleeding compared with their younger counterparts. Among elderly patients (> or =65 years), 1-year rates of ischemic target revascularization (7.0% versus 17.6%; P<0.0001) and subacute or late thrombosis (0% versus 2.2%; P=0.005) were reduced with stenting compared with balloon angioplasty. Routine abciximab administration, although safe, was not of definite benefit in elderly patients. Rates of mortality, reinfarction, disabling stroke, and major bleeding in the elderly were independent of reperfusion modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite contemporary mechanical reperfusion strategies, mortality, major bleeding, and stroke rates remain high in elderly patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, outcomes that are not affected by stents or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. By reducing restenosis, however, stent implantation improves clinical outcomes in elderly patients with AMI.

摘要

背景

生物学年龄是急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者预后的重要决定因素。我们旨在研究AMI患者接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后年龄的影响,并确定常规冠状动脉支架植入和/或血小板糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂是否能改善老年患者直接血管成形术后的临床结局。

方法与结果

在CADILLAC试验中,2082例AMI患者被随机分为单纯球囊血管成形术、球囊血管成形术加阿昔单抗、单纯支架置入术或支架置入术加阿昔单抗。没有患者因高龄被排除;入选患者年龄范围为21至95岁。年龄每增加一个十分位数,1年死亡率就会增加,65岁以后呈指数增长(<55岁患者为1.6%,55至65岁患者为2.1%,65至75岁患者为7.1%,>75岁患者为11.1%;P<0.0001)。与年轻患者相比,老年患者的中风和大出血发生率也更高。在老年患者(≥65岁)中,与球囊血管成形术相比,支架置入术使1年缺血性靶血管重建率(7.0%对17.6%;P<0.0001)和亚急性或晚期血栓形成率(0%对2.2%;P=0.005)降低。常规使用阿昔单抗虽然安全,但对老年患者没有明确益处。老年患者的死亡率、再梗死率、致残性中风率和大出血率与再灌注方式无关。

结论

尽管采用了当代机械再灌注策略,但接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者的死亡率、大出血率和中风率仍然很高,这些结局不受支架或糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂的影响。然而,通过减少再狭窄,支架植入可改善老年AMI患者的临床结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验