Long-term results of Rehbein's procedure: a retrospective study in German-speaking countries.

AIM

In contrast to other countries, no collective study of Rehbein's procedure in German-speaking nations has been performed. Therefore, our intention was, analogously to Goto and Ikeda's (10) Japanese study in 1984, Kleinhaus's (13) study on Swenson's procedure in 1979, Bourdelat's (2) French-Canadian investigation into Duhamel's technique in 1997 and Martuciello's (11) and Teitelbaum's (16) follow-up in the year 2000, to perform a follow-up study of Rehbein's technique of deep anterior resection.

METHODS

The data of 200 patients from 22 German-speaking centers in Switzerland, Austria and Germany were collected. These data were gathered by questionnaire and the children were followed up in the individual participating hospitals for at least 3.5 years after the procedure. The procedure was performed between 1993 and 1997, over a 5-year period. The questionnaire contained 74 items including anamnestic data, diagnostic postoperative treatment and reoperations.

RESULTS

Concerning the incidence of anastomotic leaks and resolving anastomotic strictures there was no significant difference between the results in our series and those of the collective analyses made by Hofmann von Kap-herr (7), Holschneider (9) and Sherman (18). In 6.6 % of the 191 patients an anastomotic leak and in 9.9 % a rectal stricture, which had to be dilated, was observed. Concerning late complications, 22.8 % of the children suffered from constipation, 4.3 % from encopresis, 10.6 % from enterocolitis and only 0.5 % from enuresis. The frequency of constipation diminishes over the years. A comparison of the different large series in the literature clearly shows that the incidence of constipation is higher after Rehbein's procedure and the frequency of urinary incontinence and encopresis higher following Swenson's, Soave's and Duhamel's techniques. The incidence of enterocolitis is less after Rehbein's procedure than after Swenson's, Soave's and Duhamel's techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

The different results in the literature are due to the individual experience of the author, the very different follow-up methods and the date of follow-up. Therefore, the different results are hard to compare with our study. Nevertheless, Rehbein's anterior resection still could be presented as an adequate and important method to treat Hirschsprung's disease.