Pedersen Oluf, Gaede Peter
Steno Diabetes Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Metabolism. 2003 Aug;52(8 Suppl 1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(03)00213-0.
We recently published the results of the Steno-2 study, which evaluated the benefits of intensified integrated behavior modification and targeted polypharmacy. The results provide abundant evidence that an ambitious treatment strategy is superior to a conventional one. The study involved 160 high-risk type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria-a strong risk factor of both macrovascular and microvascular complications-aged 55.1 years, who were randomly assigned to a conventional or an intensive, multifactorial intervention for a period of 7.8 years. In the intensive group, a stepwise treatment plan was adopted involving both continuous lifestyle education and motivation and an ambitious goal-oriented pharmacological treatment of known modifiable risk factors. The conventional group was treated in accordance with national guidelines for type 2 diabetes with less stringent goals. The specific significant group differences in the degree of change in key clinical and biochemical variables at the end of the study were (in the intensive group): lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), fasting serum total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, fasting serum triglycerides, and 24-hour urine albumin excretion, as well as increased carbohydrate and decreased fat intake as percentage of total energy. There was no difference in weight gain between groups during follow-up and no other major side effects were reported. The primary end point was a macrovascular outcome: a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous coronary intervention, nonfatal stroke, amputation for ischemia, or vascular surgery for peripheral arterial atherosclerosis. The differences between groups in surrogate end points translated into the following significant group differences in final clinical end points: 44% of patients in the conventional group had a cardiovascular event compared with 24% in the intensive group, ie, a relative risk reduction of about 50%. Also, the relative risk of nephropathy, retinopathy, and autonomic neuropathy (secondary end points) was diminished by about 60% in the intensively treated group. In conclusion, an intensified and goal-oriented multipronged approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes reduces cardiovascular events, as well as nephropathy, retinopathy, and autonomic neuropathy, by about half. The challenge is to ensure that this experience is widely adopted in daily practice.
我们最近公布了斯滕诺 - 2研究的结果,该研究评估了强化综合行为矫正和针对性联合药物治疗的益处。结果提供了充分证据表明,积极的治疗策略优于传统策略。该研究纳入了160名患有微量白蛋白尿的2型糖尿病高危患者(微量白蛋白尿是大血管和微血管并发症的一个重要危险因素),年龄为55.1岁,他们被随机分配接受为期7.8年的传统治疗或强化多因素干预。在强化治疗组中,采用了逐步治疗计划,包括持续的生活方式教育和激励,以及针对已知可改变危险因素的积极目标导向药物治疗。传统治疗组按照国家2型糖尿病指南进行治疗,目标没那么严格。在研究结束时,关键临床和生化变量变化程度的具体显著组间差异为(强化治疗组):收缩压和舒张压降低、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)降低、空腹血清总胆固醇和低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇降低、空腹血清甘油三酯降低、24小时尿白蛋白排泄降低,以及碳水化合物摄入量增加和脂肪摄入量占总能量的百分比降低。随访期间两组体重增加无差异,且未报告其他主要副作用。主要终点是大血管结局:心血管原因死亡、非致命性心肌梗死、冠状动脉搭桥术、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、非致命性中风、缺血性截肢或外周动脉粥样硬化血管手术的综合结果。替代终点的组间差异转化为最终临床终点的以下显著组间差异:传统治疗组44%的患者发生心血管事件,而强化治疗组为24%,即相对风险降低约50%。此外,强化治疗组肾病、视网膜病变和自主神经病变(次要终点)的相对风险降低了约60%。总之,强化且目标导向的多管齐下2型糖尿病治疗方法可将心血管事件以及肾病、视网膜病变和自主神经病变减少约一半。挑战在于确保这种经验在日常实践中得到广泛应用。