Suppr超能文献

几种用于分析冠状动脉搭桥手术成本的回归模型的比较。

A comparison of several regression models for analysing cost of CABG surgery.

作者信息

Austin Peter C, Ghali William A, Tu Jack V

机构信息

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2003 Sep 15;22(17):2799-815. doi: 10.1002/sim.1442.

Abstract

Investigators in clinical research are often interested in determining the association between patient characteristics and cost of medical or surgical treatment. However, there is no uniformly agreed upon regression model with which to analyse cost data. The objective of the current study was to compare the performance of linear regression, linear regression with log-transformed cost, generalized linear models with Poisson, negative binomial and gamma distributions, median regression, and proportional hazards models for analysing costs in a cohort of patients undergoing CABG surgery. The study was performed on data comprising 1959 patients who underwent CABG surgery in Calgary, Alberta, between June 1994 and March 1998. Ten of 21 patient characteristics were significantly associated with cost of surgery in all seven models. Eight variables were not significantly associated with cost of surgery in all seven models. Using mean squared prediction error as a loss function, proportional hazards regression and the three generalized linear models were best able to predict cost in independent validation data. Using mean absolute error, linear regression with log-transformed cost, proportional hazards regression, and median regression to predict median cost, were best able to predict cost in independent validation data. Since the models demonstrated good consistency in identifying factors associated with increased cost of CABG surgery, any of the seven models can be used for identifying factors associated with increased cost of surgery. However, the magnitude of, and the interpretation of, the coefficients vary across models. Researchers are encouraged to consider a variety of candidate models, including those better known in the econometrics literature, rather than begin data analysis with one regression model selected a priori. The final choice of regression model should be made after a careful assessment of how best to assess predictive ability and should be tailored to the particular data in question.

摘要

临床研究中的调查人员通常对确定患者特征与医疗或手术治疗费用之间的关联感兴趣。然而,目前尚无统一认可的用于分析成本数据的回归模型。本研究的目的是比较线性回归、成本对数变换后的线性回归、具有泊松分布、负二项分布和伽马分布的广义线性模型、中位数回归以及比例风险模型在分析接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术患者队列成本方面的性能。该研究基于1994年6月至1998年3月在艾伯塔省卡尔加里接受CABG手术的1959例患者的数据进行。在所有七个模型中,21项患者特征中有10项与手术成本显著相关。8个变量在所有七个模型中与手术成本均无显著关联。以均方预测误差作为损失函数,比例风险回归和三个广义线性模型在独立验证数据中最能预测成本。以平均绝对误差衡量,成本对数变换后的线性回归、比例风险回归和中位数回归在独立验证数据中最能预测中位数成本。由于这些模型在识别与CABG手术成本增加相关的因素方面表现出良好的一致性,因此这七个模型中的任何一个都可用于识别与手术成本增加相关的因素。然而,不同模型中系数的大小和解释各不相同。鼓励研究人员考虑多种候选模型,包括计量经济学文献中更知名的模型,而不是先验地选择一个回归模型开始数据分析。回归模型的最终选择应在仔细评估如何最佳评估预测能力之后做出,并应根据所讨论的特定数据进行调整。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验