Yigitler Cengizhan, Farges Olivier, Kianmanesh Reza, Regimbeau Jean-Marc, Abdalla Eddie K, Belghiti Jacques
Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Beaujon Hospital [Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris], University Paris 7, France.
Liver Transpl. 2003 Sep;9(9):S18-25. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50194.
The maximum extent of hepatic resection compatible with a safe postoperative outcome is unknown. The study goal was to determine the incidence and impact of a small remnant liver volume after major liver resection in patients with normal liver parenchyma. Among 265 major hepatectomies performed at our institution (1998 to 2000), 138 patients with normal liver and a remnant liver volume (RLV) systematically calculated from the ratio of RLV to functional liver volume (FLV) were studied. Patients were divided into five groups based on RLV-FLV ratio from </=30% to >/=60%. Kinetics of postoperative liver function tests were correlated with RLV. Postoperative complications were stratified by RLV-FLV ratios. Ninety patients (65%) underwent resection of up to four Couinaud segments. The RLV-FLV ratio was </=60% in 94 patients (68%) including only 13 (9%) with RLV-FLV </=30%. There was no linear correlation between the number of resected segments and the RLV-FLV. Postoperative serum bilirubin but not prothrombin time correlated with extent of resection. The incidence of complications including liver failure was not different among groups. Analysis of the four groups with a RLV-FLV ratio <60% showed a trend toward more complications and a longer intensive care unit stay in patients with the smallest RLVs. After major hepatectomy in patients with normal livers, the proportion of patients with a small remnant liver is low and not directly related to the number of segments resected. Although the rate of postoperative complications, including liver failure, did not directly correlate with the volume of remaining liver, the postoperative course was more difficult for patients with smaller remnants. Therefore preoperative portal vein embolization should be considered in patients who will undergo extended liver resection who have (1) injured liver or (2) normal liver when the planned procedure will be complex or when the anticipated RLV-FLV will be <30%.
与安全术后结局相符的最大肝切除范围尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定肝实质正常的患者在接受大肝切除术后小肝残余体积的发生率及其影响。在我们机构(1998年至2000年)进行的265例大肝切除术中,对138例肝实质正常且根据肝残余体积(RLV)与功能性肝体积(FLV)之比系统计算出肝残余体积的患者进行了研究。根据RLV-FLV比值从≤30%至≥60%将患者分为五组。术后肝功能检查的动态变化与RLV相关。术后并发症按RLV-FLV比值分层。90例患者(65%)接受了多达四个Couinaud肝段的切除。94例患者(68%)的RLV-FLV比值≤60%,其中只有13例(9%)的RLV-FLV≤30%。切除肝段数量与RLV-FLV之间无线性相关性。术后血清胆红素而非凝血酶原时间与切除范围相关。包括肝衰竭在内的并发症发生率在各组之间无差异。对RLV-FLV比值<60%的四组患者进行分析显示,肝残余体积最小的患者有并发症更多和重症监护病房住院时间更长的趋势。在肝实质正常的患者接受大肝切除术后,肝残余体积小的患者比例较低,且与切除的肝段数量无直接关系。虽然包括肝衰竭在内的术后并发症发生率与剩余肝体积无直接相关性,但肝残余体积较小的患者术后病程更艰难。因此,对于将接受扩大肝切除的患者,如果有以下情况应考虑术前门静脉栓塞:(1)肝损伤或(2)肝实质正常但计划手术复杂或预期RLV-FLV<30%。