Nenova Ivanka S, Goranov Stefan E, Mateva Nonka G, Ananoshtev Nikola H
Clinic of Hematology, Medical University Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2003;45(1):13-9.
The use of fluoroquinolones in the treatment of cytotoxic therapy-induced febrile neutropenia is controversial.
The aim of the study was to compare the therapeutic effect of fluoroquinolones with that of standard antibiotic regimens in patients with hematologic malignacies and febrile neutropenia following antineoplastic chemotherapy.
This is a prospective randomized study including 129 patients with 141 neutropenic episodes divided into two groups. Fluoroquinolones are used in the trial group and broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics in the control group. The data are analyzed using alternative analysis, non-parametrical chi-square test and Student-Fisher t-test.
The febrile neutropenic episodes were classified as fever of unknown origin (50.4%) and documented infection (49.6%). In the category "fever of unknown origin" no statistically significant difference was found in the clinical effect, patient survival, general and infectious lethality between the trial and control group. In the category "documented infection" the trial group showed significantly lower therapeutic effect and lower infection-free survival of the patients. The clinical effect and infection-free survival after treatment with fluoroquinolones were significantly lower in the category "documented infection" than in the category "fever of unknown origin".
Fluoroquinolones can be alternative drugs to the standard antibiotic regimens in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in cases of fever of unknown origin. Fluoroquinolone monotherapy is not recommended in cases of febrile neutropenia with documented infection.
氟喹诺酮类药物在治疗细胞毒性疗法引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的应用存在争议。
本研究旨在比较氟喹诺酮类药物与标准抗生素方案对血液系统恶性肿瘤患者在抗肿瘤化疗后出现发热性中性粒细胞减少症的治疗效果。
这是一项前瞻性随机研究,纳入129例患者,共141次中性粒细胞减少发作,分为两组。试验组使用氟喹诺酮类药物,对照组使用广谱β-内酰胺类抗生素。数据采用交替分析、非参数卡方检验和Student-Fisher t检验进行分析。
发热性中性粒细胞减少发作分为不明原因发热(50.4%)和确诊感染(49.6%)。在“不明原因发热”类别中,试验组和对照组在临床效果、患者生存率、总体及感染致死率方面未发现统计学显著差异。在“确诊感染”类别中,试验组显示出显著较低的治疗效果和患者无感染生存率。氟喹诺酮类药物治疗后在“确诊感染”类别中的临床效果和无感染生存率显著低于“不明原因发热”类别。
在不明原因发热的发热性中性粒细胞减少症治疗中,氟喹诺酮类药物可作为标准抗生素方案的替代药物。对于确诊感染的发热性中性粒细胞减少症病例,不推荐使用氟喹诺酮类药物单药治疗。