Kroll Thilo, Neri Melinda T
NRH Center for Health and Disability Research, Washington, DC 20036-5750, USA.
Disabil Rehabil. 2003 Oct 7;25(19):1106-14. doi: 10.1080/0963828031000152002.
To describe the experiences with care co-ordination of people with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, or spinal cord injury; to determine barriers to effective care co-ordination; and to compare experiences across disability and health plan types.
Qualitative, semi-structured telephone interviews with 30 people with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, or spinal cord injury. Interviews focused on the care co-ordination experience of individuals in managed care and traditional indemnity health insurance plans in the USA and were analysed using NVivo.
Half of the respondents reported that they had a health professional who co-ordinated their care. Participants identified barriers that prevented effective care co-ordination, including a lack of disability specific knowledge, providers' limited time and effort related to care, and insufficient communication among providers. There were few differences between managed care and fee-for-service respondents with regard to these barriers.
Study findings reveal few differences in the care co-ordination experiences amongst people with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, or spinal cord injury in both plan types. All providers need to become more literate about the health care needs of people with physical disabilities, and health plans need to reward communication among providers and the time and effort invested in care co-ordination.
描述脑瘫、多发性硬化症或脊髓损伤患者的护理协调经验;确定有效护理协调的障碍;并比较不同残疾类型和健康计划类型的经验。
对30名脑瘫、多发性硬化症或脊髓损伤患者进行定性、半结构化电话访谈。访谈聚焦于美国管理式医疗和传统定额健康保险计划中个人的护理协调经验,并使用NVivo进行分析。
一半的受访者表示他们有一位协调其护理的健康专业人员。参与者指出了妨碍有效护理协调的障碍,包括缺乏针对残疾的特定知识、提供者与护理相关的时间和精力有限,以及提供者之间沟通不足。在这些障碍方面,管理式医疗和按服务收费的受访者之间几乎没有差异。
研究结果表明,两种计划类型中脑瘫、多发性硬化症或脊髓损伤患者的护理协调经验几乎没有差异。所有提供者都需要更加了解身体残疾者的医疗保健需求,健康计划需要奖励提供者之间的沟通以及投入护理协调的时间和精力。