National consequences. A new California statute mandating disclosure of security breaches will have an impact nationwide.
作者信息
Hirsch Reece
出版信息
Healthc Inform. 2003 Aug;20(8):52.
PMID:12947752
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
2
Security breaches: tips for assessing and limiting your risks.安全漏洞：评估和降低风险的小贴士。
J Med Pract Manage. 2011 May-Jun;26(6):385-8.
3
US policy on data disclosure debated.美国关于数据披露的政策引发争议。
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Feb;21(2):116-7. doi: 10.1038/nbt0203-116.
4
Decisions to breach confidentiality when prisoners report violations of institutional rules.当囚犯报告违反机构规定的行为时，关于违反保密规定的决定。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2009;37(2):150-4.
5
California sets standard on identity theft safeguards.加利福尼亚州制定身份盗窃防范标准。
Patient Care Manag. 2003 Sep;19(9):1-2.
6
Reflections on privacy 2.0.关于隐私2.0的思考。
Sci Am. 2008 Sep;299(3):50-5. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0908-50.
7
Federal Trade Commission Red Flag Rules raise compliance concerns for dentists.美国联邦贸易委员会的红旗规则引发了牙医对合规性的担忧。
N Y State Dent J. 2009 Jan;75(1):8-12.
8
Recognizing and reducing risks: HIPAA privacy and security enforcement.识别与降低风险：《健康保险流通与责任法案》隐私与安全执法
Mich Health Hosp. 2003 Nov-Dec;39(6):32-3.
9
[The information security and its urgency for military medical service].[信息安全及其对军事医疗服务的紧迫性]
Voen Med Zh. 2003 May;324(5):12-7.
10
Special report. Regulating security: what the new California and NY state laws require and how hospitals are responding.特别报道。规范安全：加利福尼亚州和纽约州新法律的要求以及医院的应对措施。
Hosp Secur Saf Manage. 1994 Apr;14(12):5-10.
Zotero 插件