Suppr超能文献

胆结石的分类与命名再探讨。

Classification and nomenclature of gallstones revisited.

作者信息

Kim In Sook, Myung Seung-Jae, Lee Sang-Soo, Lee Sung-Koo, Kim Myung-Hwan

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 388-1 Pungnap- dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea.

出版信息

Yonsei Med J. 2003 Aug 30;44(4):561-70. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2003.44.4.561.

Abstract

Over the decades, there has been a great deal progress in the understanding of gallstones owing to the continuous efforts aimed at elucidating their pathogenesis. An optimal classification system is needed because the etiology, pathogenesis, clinical features and treatment can be different according to the classes. Currently, two systems are widely used: one from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-International Workshop on Pigment Gallstone Disease held in 1981 and the other from Gallstone Research Committee from the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology in 1984. However, some stones cannot be classified into either of these categories. In addition, several terms have been not been clearly defined. In several aspects, both systems need to be reevaluated. This paper reviewed the classification systems and terms that are currently used for gallstones, and raises several points that need to be reconsidered. In the near future, large scaled prospective studies on gallstones need to be carried out on the basis of the external color, chemistry, cutting surface, etc. Only when these studies are completed can an ideal classification system for gallstones be expected.

摘要

几十年来,由于人们不断努力阐明胆结石的发病机制,在胆结石的认识方面取得了很大进展。由于病因、发病机制、临床特征和治疗方法会因类别不同而有所差异,因此需要一个最佳的分类系统。目前,有两种系统被广泛使用:一种是1981年美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)-色素性胆结石病国际研讨会提出的,另一种是1984年日本胃肠病学会胆结石研究委员会提出的。然而,有些结石无法归入这两类中的任何一类。此外,一些术语尚未得到明确界定。在几个方面,这两种系统都需要重新评估。本文回顾了目前用于胆结石的分类系统和术语,并提出了几个需要重新考虑的要点。在不久的将来,需要基于外部颜色、化学成分、切面等对胆结石进行大规模的前瞻性研究。只有完成这些研究,才能期待一个理想的胆结石分类系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验