Nilsson Remahl A I M, Laudon Meyer E, Cordonnier C, Goadsby P J
Department of Neurology at Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.
Cephalalgia. 2003 Sep;23(7):504-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00531.x.
Probably because of its relative rarity as primary headache, there are few well-controlled clinical trials on cluster headache (CH) patients. Due to the severity of the pain, the placebo response in CH has been considered to be small. During the eighties the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were reported, and placebo responses demonstrated. Here we review the placebo response in CH trials in order to assess its magnitude and consider how future studies can be optimized. Six trials were identified with a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design testing treatments of acute CH. For those with a primary endpoint set to no or mild headache the placebo responses varied from 7 to 42%. In five of seven prophylactic trials, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design, the placebo was merely used to set a baseline for comparison. The placebo responses were reported in only two trials. Here the response varies from 14 to 43%, the lowest value was reported using the strict endpoint; cessation of headache attacks. We conclude that a placebo response exists in trials of drugs on CH patients. Furthermore, this placebo response is of the same magnitude as that seen in migraine studies. We recommend the use of IHS guidelines when designing new trials. The possibility of a genuine biological mechanism responsible for the placebo response is discussed.
可能由于丛集性头痛(CH)作为原发性头痛相对罕见,针对丛集性头痛患者的严格对照临床试验较少。由于疼痛严重,丛集性头痛中的安慰剂反应被认为较小。在20世纪80年代,首次报道了双盲、安慰剂对照试验,并证实了安慰剂反应。在此,我们回顾丛集性头痛试验中的安慰剂反应,以评估其程度,并考虑如何优化未来的研究。确定了六项采用双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉设计测试急性丛集性头痛治疗方法的试验。对于那些主要终点设定为无头痛或轻度头痛的试验,安慰剂反应从7%到42%不等。在七项预防性试验中的五项中,采用双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组设计,安慰剂仅用于设定比较基线。仅在两项试验中报告了安慰剂反应。此处反应从14%到43%不等,使用严格终点(头痛发作停止)报告的最低值。我们得出结论,在针对丛集性头痛患者的药物试验中存在安慰剂反应。此外,这种安慰剂反应的程度与偏头痛研究中所见的相同。我们建议在设计新试验时使用国际头痛协会(IHS)指南。还讨论了存在导致安慰剂反应的真正生物学机制的可能性。