• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丛集性头痛试验中的安慰剂反应:一项综述。

Placebo response in cluster headache trials: a review.

作者信息

Nilsson Remahl A I M, Laudon Meyer E, Cordonnier C, Goadsby P J

机构信息

Department of Neurology at Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge University Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2003 Sep;23(7):504-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00531.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00531.x
PMID:12950375
Abstract

Probably because of its relative rarity as primary headache, there are few well-controlled clinical trials on cluster headache (CH) patients. Due to the severity of the pain, the placebo response in CH has been considered to be small. During the eighties the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were reported, and placebo responses demonstrated. Here we review the placebo response in CH trials in order to assess its magnitude and consider how future studies can be optimized. Six trials were identified with a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over design testing treatments of acute CH. For those with a primary endpoint set to no or mild headache the placebo responses varied from 7 to 42%. In five of seven prophylactic trials, using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design, the placebo was merely used to set a baseline for comparison. The placebo responses were reported in only two trials. Here the response varies from 14 to 43%, the lowest value was reported using the strict endpoint; cessation of headache attacks. We conclude that a placebo response exists in trials of drugs on CH patients. Furthermore, this placebo response is of the same magnitude as that seen in migraine studies. We recommend the use of IHS guidelines when designing new trials. The possibility of a genuine biological mechanism responsible for the placebo response is discussed.

摘要

可能由于丛集性头痛(CH)作为原发性头痛相对罕见,针对丛集性头痛患者的严格对照临床试验较少。由于疼痛严重,丛集性头痛中的安慰剂反应被认为较小。在20世纪80年代,首次报道了双盲、安慰剂对照试验,并证实了安慰剂反应。在此,我们回顾丛集性头痛试验中的安慰剂反应,以评估其程度,并考虑如何优化未来的研究。确定了六项采用双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉设计测试急性丛集性头痛治疗方法的试验。对于那些主要终点设定为无头痛或轻度头痛的试验,安慰剂反应从7%到42%不等。在七项预防性试验中的五项中,采用双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组设计,安慰剂仅用于设定比较基线。仅在两项试验中报告了安慰剂反应。此处反应从14%到43%不等,使用严格终点(头痛发作停止)报告的最低值。我们得出结论,在针对丛集性头痛患者的药物试验中存在安慰剂反应。此外,这种安慰剂反应的程度与偏头痛研究中所见的相同。我们建议在设计新试验时使用国际头痛协会(IHS)指南。还讨论了存在导致安慰剂反应的真正生物学机制的可能性。

相似文献

1
Placebo response in cluster headache trials: a review.丛集性头痛试验中的安慰剂反应:一项综述。
Cephalalgia. 2003 Sep;23(7):504-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2003.00531.x.
2
Acute and preventive pharmacologic treatment of cluster headache.丛集性头痛的急性和预防性药物治疗。
Neurology. 2010 Aug 3;75(5):463-73. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181eb58c8.
3
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment of active cluster headache: a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study.高压氧治疗发作性丛集性头痛:一项双盲安慰剂对照交叉研究。
Cephalalgia. 2002 Nov;22(9):730-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.2002.00450.x.
4
Challenges and complexities in designing cluster headache prevention clinical trials: A narrative review.丛集性头痛预防临床试验设计的挑战和复杂性:叙事性综述。
Headache. 2022 Apr;62(4):453-472. doi: 10.1111/head.14292. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
5
A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of intranasal capsaicin for cluster headache.
Cephalalgia. 1993 Apr;13(2):114-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1993.1302114.x.
6
Subcutaneous octreotide in cluster headache: randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study.皮下注射奥曲肽治疗丛集性头痛:随机安慰剂对照双盲交叉研究。
Ann Neurol. 2004 Oct;56(4):488-94. doi: 10.1002/ana.20210.
7
Zolmitriptan nasal spray in the acute treatment of cluster headache: a double-blind study.佐米曲普坦鼻喷雾剂用于丛集性头痛的急性治疗:一项双盲研究。
Neurology. 2007 Aug 28;69(9):821-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000267886.85210.37.
8
Zolmitriptan nasal spray in the acute treatment of cluster headache: a meta-analysis of two studies.佐米曲普坦鼻喷剂治疗丛集性头痛的疗效分析:两项研究的荟萃分析。
Headache. 2009 Oct;49(9):1315-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01518.x.
9
Frovatriptan for prophylactic treatment of cluster headache: lessons for future trial design.氟伐曲坦用于预防性治疗丛集性头痛:对未来试验设计的启示。
Headache. 2011 Jan;51(1):129-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01772.x. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
10
Antiepileptic drugs in the prophylaxis of migraine, chronic headache forms and cluster headache: a review of their efficacy and tolerability.抗癫痫药物用于偏头痛、慢性头痛类型及丛集性头痛的预防:疗效与耐受性综述
Neurol Sci. 2007 May;28 Suppl 2:S188-97. doi: 10.1007/s10072-007-0775-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Is It All in Your Head? Placebo Effects in Concussion Prevention.这全凭心理作用?安慰剂效应在脑震荡预防中的作用
Sports Med. 2025 Apr;55(4):781-797. doi: 10.1007/s40279-024-02158-2. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
2
Pre-cluster symptoms in a Taiwanese cohort of cluster headache: symptom profiles and clinical predictions.台湾集群性头痛患者的集群前期症状:症状特征和临床预测。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Oct 8;25(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01862-8.
3
Commentary on 2022 guidelines on clinical trial design in cluster headache and further suggestions.
关于集群性头痛临床试验设计指南的评论及进一步建议。
J Headache Pain. 2024 Mar 7;25(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s10194-024-01732-3.
4
[Galcanezumab for episodic and chronic cluster headache].[加卡尼单抗用于发作性和慢性丛集性头痛]
Schmerz. 2023 Jun;37(3):168-174. doi: 10.1007/s00482-022-00648-8. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
Challenges and complexities in designing cluster headache prevention clinical trials: A narrative review.丛集性头痛预防临床试验设计的挑战和复杂性:叙事性综述。
Headache. 2022 Apr;62(4):453-472. doi: 10.1111/head.14292. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
6
Comparative Impact of Pharmacological Therapies on Cluster Headache Management: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.药物治疗对丛集性头痛管理的比较影响:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 4;11(5):1411. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051411.
7
Great occipital nerve long-acting steroid injections in cluster headache therapy: an observational prospective study.大枕神经长效类固醇注射治疗丛集性头痛:一项观察性前瞻性研究。
J Neurol. 2022 Apr;269(4):2193-2199. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10884-0. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
8
Does Health Literacy Make a Difference? Comparing the Effect of Conventional Medicine Versus Homeopathic Prescribing on Treatment Credibility and Expectancy.健康素养有影响吗?比较传统医学与顺势疗法开方对治疗可信度和期望值的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 1;12:581255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.581255. eCollection 2021.
9
Normobaric and hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment and prevention of migraine and cluster headache.常压和高压氧疗法用于偏头痛和丛集性头痛的治疗与预防。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 28;2015(12):CD005219. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005219.pub3.
10
[Therapeutic neuromodulation in primary headaches].[原发性头痛的治疗性神经调节]
Nervenarzt. 2011 Jun;82(6):743-52. doi: 10.1007/s00115-010-3170-x.