Rainov Nikolai G, Ren Huan
Department of Neurological Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L9 7LJ, UK.
Cancer J. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):180-8. doi: 10.1097/00130404-200305000-00006.
Brain tumors were the first human malignancy to be targeted by therapeutic transfer of nucleic acids into somatic cells, a process also known as gene therapy. Malignant brain tumor cells in the adult brain have some unique biologic features, such as high mitotic activity on an essentially postmitotic background and virtually no tumor spread outside of the central nervous system. Brain tumors seem therefore to offer major advantages in the design of tumor-selective gene therapy strategies, and the role of gene therapy in malignant glioma has been investigated since the late 1980s, initially in numerous laboratory studies and later on in clinical trials.
Retrovirus has been one of the earliest recombinant virus vectors used in brain tumors. Experiments in cell culture and in animal models have demonstrated the feasibility of retrovirus-mediated transduction and subsequent killing of glioma cells by toxic transgenes. Phase I and II clinical studies in patients with recurrent malignant glioma have shown a favorable safety profile and some efficacy of retrovirus-mediated gene therapy. However, the only prospective, randomized, phase III clinical study of retrovirus gene therapy in primary malignant glioma failed to demonstrate significant extension of progression-free or overall survival. Adenovirus- and herpes simplex virus type 1-based vectors have been actively investigated along with retrovirus, but their clinical use is still limited, mostly because of safety concerns. To increase efficacy, novel generations of therapeutic adenovirus and herpes simplex virus type 1 rely more on genetically engineered and tumor-selective lytic properties and less on the actual transfer of therapeutic genes.
The failure of most clinical gene therapy protocols to produce a significant and unequivocal benefitto brain tumor patients seems to be mainly due to the low tumor cell transduction rates observed in vivo, but it may also depend on the respective physical delivery strategy of the vector. Standard radiologic criteria for assessing the efficacy of clinical treatments may also not be fully applicable to the specific metabolic changes and blood-brain barrier permeability phenomena caused in brain tumors by virus-mediated gene therapy. Clinical trials in malignant glioma have nevertheless produced a substantial amount of data and have contributed to the continuous improvement of vector systems, delivery methods, and clinical protocols.
脑肿瘤是首个通过将核酸治疗性导入体细胞来进行靶向治疗的人类恶性肿瘤,这一过程也被称为基因治疗。成人大脑内的恶性脑肿瘤细胞具有一些独特的生物学特性,比如在基本处于有丝分裂后期的背景下有较高的有丝分裂活性,并且实际上肿瘤不会扩散到中枢神经系统之外。因此,脑肿瘤似乎在肿瘤选择性基因治疗策略的设计中具有主要优势,自20世纪80年代末以来,基因治疗在恶性胶质瘤中的作用就一直受到研究,最初是在众多实验室研究中,后来开展了临床试验。
逆转录病毒一直是最早用于脑肿瘤的重组病毒载体之一。细胞培养和动物模型实验已经证明了逆转录病毒介导的转导以及随后通过毒性转基因杀死胶质瘤细胞的可行性。复发性恶性胶质瘤患者的I期和II期临床研究显示出良好的安全性以及逆转录病毒介导的基因治疗的一些疗效。然而,唯一一项关于逆转录病毒基因治疗原发性恶性胶质瘤的前瞻性、随机、III期临床研究未能证明无进展生存期或总生存期有显著延长。基于腺病毒和1型单纯疱疹病毒的载体与逆转录病毒一起也受到了积极研究,但其临床应用仍然有限,主要是出于安全性考虑。为了提高疗效,新一代治疗性腺病毒和1型单纯疱疹病毒更多地依赖基因工程和肿瘤选择性裂解特性,而较少依赖治疗性基因的实际转移。
大多数临床基因治疗方案未能给脑肿瘤患者带来显著且明确的益处,这似乎主要是由于在体内观察到的肿瘤细胞转导率较低,但也可能取决于载体各自的物理递送策略。评估临床治疗疗效的标准放射学标准可能也不完全适用于病毒介导的基因治疗在脑肿瘤中引起的特定代谢变化和血脑屏障通透性现象。不过,恶性胶质瘤的临床试验已经产生了大量数据,并有助于载体系统、递送方法和临床方案的不断改进。