Suppr超能文献

分娩期间两种宫内压力导管的比较。

Comparison of two intrauterine pressure catheters during labor.

作者信息

Dowdle Mark A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cassia Regional Medical Center, 1501 Hiland Avenue, Suite B-2, Burley, ID 83318, USA.

出版信息

J Reprod Med. 2003 Jul;48(7):501-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the Koala air-charged coupled catheter (Clinical Innovations, Inc., Murray, Utah) for monitoring intrauterine pressure (IUP) during active labor with an electronic pressure transducer-tip catheter, Intran Plus (Utah Medical Products, Midvale, Utah).

STUDY DESIGN

Simultaneous recordings with Koala and Intran catheters bound together at their tips were made in 18 term patients using comparably calibrated fetal monitors.

RESULTS

Coefficients of correlation between the two IUP catheter systems for mean uterine baseline, peak pressures, contraction frequency and duration were .78, .90, 1.00 and .63, respectively. Both systems functioned equally well in displaying abnormal uterine activity. Some difficulty was encountered in placing the combined catheters in the amniotic fluid space: 4 of 18 (23%) were placed outside the chorionic membrane, in the extraovular space.

CONCLUSION

Comparisons of the recordings from the Koala and Intran Plus catheters showed similar mean baseline uterine tone, peak pressures, contraction frequency and duration.

摘要

目的

将考拉充气耦合导管(临床创新公司,犹他州默里)与电子压力传感器尖端导管Intran Plus(犹他医疗产品公司,犹他州米德瓦尔)在活跃期分娩期间监测宫内压(IUP)的情况进行比较。

研究设计

在18名足月患者中,使用校准程度相当的胎儿监护仪对尖端绑在一起的考拉导管和Intran导管进行同步记录。

结果

两种IUP导管系统在平均子宫基线、峰值压力、宫缩频率和持续时间方面的相关系数分别为0.78、0.90、1.00和0.63。两种系统在显示异常子宫活动方面功能同样良好。将组合导管放置在羊水腔时遇到了一些困难:18例中有4例(23%)放置在绒毛膜外的卵外间隙。

结论

考拉导管和Intran Plus导管的记录比较显示,平均基线子宫张力、峰值压力、宫缩频率和持续时间相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验