Nieri Paola, Martinotti Enrica, Testai Lara, Martinelli Cinzia, Breschi Maria Cristina
Department of Psychiatry, Neurobiology, Pharmacology and Biotechnology, University of Pisa, Via Bonanno 6, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Eur J Pharmacol. 2003 Aug 15;475(1-3):115-8. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(03)02122-8.
The effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on the non-adrenergic non-cholinergic (NANC) inhibitory responses to electrical field stimulation in guinea-pig trachea were assessed. R-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholilinyl) methyl]pyrrolo [1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-(1-naphthalenyl)methanone mesylate (WIN 55,212-2; 10(-5) M) significantly enhanced the frequency-dependent response to electrical stimulation. The same concentration of R-(N)-(2-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenamide (R(+)methanandamide) and 1-propyl-2-methyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-015) did not affect significantly the electrically induced inhibitory NANC responses. The effect of WIN 55,212-2 was not modified by the cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor-selective antagonists, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR141716A; 10(-5) M) and N-(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethyl bicyclo [2.2.1] heptan-2-yl]-5-(4-chloro-3-methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (SR 144528; 10(-5) M), respectively. Moreover, the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NG-nitro-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 10(-4) M), but not the peptidase, alpha-chymotrypsin (2 U/ml), blocked the effect of WIN 55,212-2. Postsynaptically, WIN 55,212-2 did not produce any change of tracheal smooth muscle tone, either basal or histamine-induced, and did not interfere with the relaxant activity of the nitric oxide donor, sodium nitroprusside (10(-8)-10(-4) M). In conclusion, our results suggest that (a) cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor stimulation does not alter the inhibitory NANC transmission in guinea-pig trachea, and (b) WIN 55,212-2 potentiates the NO-mediated component of the NANC relaxant response to electrical stimulation through a cannabinoid receptor-independent mechanism.
评估了大麻素受体激动剂对豚鼠气管电场刺激的非肾上腺素能非胆碱能(NANC)抑制反应的影响。R-(+)-[2,3-二氢-5-甲基-3-[(吗啉代)甲基]吡咯并[1,2,3-de]-1,4-苯并恶嗪-6-基]-(1-萘基)甲酮甲磺酸盐(WIN 55,212-2;10(-5) M)显著增强了对电刺激的频率依赖性反应。相同浓度的R-(N)-(2-羟基-1-甲基乙基)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-二十碳四烯酰胺(R(+)甲麻酰胺)和1-丙基-2-甲基-3-(1-萘甲酰基)吲哚(JWH-015)对电诱导的抑制性NANC反应没有显著影响。WIN 55,212-2的作用不受大麻素CB1和CB2受体选择性拮抗剂N-(哌啶-1-基)-5-(4-氯苯基)-1-(2,4-二氯苯基)-4-甲基-1H-吡唑-3-甲酰胺盐酸盐(SR141716A;10(-5) M)和N-(1S)-内-1,3,3-三甲基双环[2.2.1]庚-2-基]-5-(4-氯-3-甲基苯基)-1-(4-甲基苄基)-吡唑-3-甲酰胺(SR 144528;10(-5) M)的影响。此外,一氧化氮合酶抑制剂L-NG-硝基精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME;10(-4) M)而非肽酶α-胰凝乳蛋白酶(2 U/ml)阻断了WIN 55,212-2的作用。在突触后,WIN 55,212-2对气管平滑肌张力(基础或组胺诱导的)没有产生任何变化,并且不干扰一氧化氮供体硝普钠(10(-8)-10(-4) M)的舒张活性。总之,我们的结果表明:(a)大麻素CB1和CB2受体刺激不会改变豚鼠气管中的抑制性NANC传递;(b)WIN 55,212-2通过一种不依赖大麻素受体的机制增强了NANC对电刺激的舒张反应中由一氧化氮介导的成分。